What gets me here is this:
We bought a house in 2007. Just before the crash. That house only regained its market value after 10 years.
Meanwhile people who bought in the SE where prices continued to rise throughout ended up gaining equity through property. Locally this has meant that people have struggled to move up the property ladder and had to move to other areas, whilst the only people who could now afford the bigger properties here largely moved up from down south.
What does that mean in terms of getting a million pound mortage?
Round here it depends on where you lived before, how much you might have got from inheritance and how much you paid off your existing mortgage.
If you stayed local for ten years, even if you had a household income of more than £100,000 is it realistic that you could get a mortgage of £1million plus without inheritance?
Its unlikely. And it needs to be seen in terms of lower regional salaries too - for people who work just as hard in the same industries and jobs.
Houses where I live are not much cheaper than many areas in the south - its a sought after location. Ironically house prices here have done better than in some other areas locally too. It shocks a few people when they see the prices.
All this 'work hard' nonsense is bullshit.
It implies that people in the 'wrong' profession don't work hard. It implies that people who work in regions don't work as hard (even allowing for cost of living issues this doesn't always add up). DH's last job required him to regularly work in London at one of company offices and he was stunned at the difference between the work ethic culture - the one in London was far poor than Manchester and was more focused on socialising as part of work. It surprised him. Ironically he was being sent to London regularly in part to give them a kick up the arse because the work culture was so bad!
There are lots of £1 million pound properties around here. They are not bought by young professional couples who are doctors or work in law who have grown up in the NW and worked in the NW. They cannot afford these properties - especially if they have kids. Not unless they have inherited. Its people who have moved in or are in their 50s who buy them.
Do I believe that only people who live(d) in the south east work harder? Do I think they do more in work than those who have working and lived around here? Do I think the cost of living difference covers the difference in wages for quality of work actually done?
Or do I think there's a primary problem with inheritance and the exorbitant house market which has caused so much economic disparity and political division in this country that no one really wants to admit to. Instead hiding behind 'work hard' is a shield to protect themselves from the idea that they are merely lucky and this is based on what is essentially a very unfair system which probably needs a great deal of reform to address social problems within the country?
Difficult question this one.
As I say. I live in a parallel universe. And even then I still sit in the lucky category....