@BoyTree
Plenty of people, mostly women, are very passive about their lives and happy to cede agency to someone else rather than work on and stick to standards and boundaries and believe 'love' is some magical property that will conquer all.
You may be right, but it sounds like you're blaming the women rather than the society in which they grow up where this attitude is (or has been) actively encouraged.
This is why its
so important that young people
particularly young women are properly educated on what marriage means.
Marriage is still seen as something which happens naturally because people love each other and is accompanied by this miasma of woo and side-issues (parties, dresses, engagement rings) etc, which clouds the facts about what it means to people's lives.
It may be that there's a "moral" overlay to this: ie that there's a hangover from the days when it was seen as a bad thing to live in sin.
Nowadays very few people still believe that sex should wait until after marriage rightly in my view but they fail to understand that just because marriage isn't essential to facilitate sex or cohabitation, that doesn't mean it doesn't matter.
Marriage is about protection. And any woman (or man for that matter) who is planning to step away from being financially active for a period of time to raise children, needs to be taught that marriage is a way to insure yourself against that financial inactivity.
It's not about blame or fault: the reality is that marriage if beneficial to whichever person does the bulk of childbearing and childcare. For totally understandable reasons, men tend to sidestep marriage until they really have to do it. You can't blame for this in some ways: a wedding is a huge pain in the arse and marriage is financially disadvantageous.
Both partners need to be properly taught what it means for them, their children and their finances, and to realise its a financial negotiation, much like buying a house.