[quote SarahAndQuack]@vanillandhoney - oh, I think we're talking cross-purposes. I didn't say longer hours, I said spreading it over more time.
I think the problem with stigmatising this is that it will inevitably hurt women. In my field, all the people who don't have caring responsibilities or disabilities are smugly explaining how they are keeping a lovely healthy 9-5 work pattern during the pandemic, no bother, aren't they great.
Then you see people saying 'and Dr So-and-So sent me an email outside work hours! That is really not on - we must have a rule about it!'
Then Dr So-and-So, who decided to fuck with Monday and went for a long walk with her three children, feels guilty 1) for clocking off on Monday during work hours and 2) for sending an email on Sunday night.
That's just silly. And the unencumbered man colleague could have just left the email unanswered (yes, I know, you can set emails to go out at specific times, but I'm trying to use this as an illustration).
I'm not sure that clocking off Monday to go for a walk with your kids is a bad thing. I think it's quite nice. But to be made to feel guilty about it is a problem.[/quote]
It depends on the work right, if you have people spreading work over longer hours how does that work for project work and people needing to get together to make decisions etc.
Thats why core hours work with some flexibility, essentially you available 9-5 and obv due to covid there is some flexibility in this e..g you might need to take houd for homeschooling that you make up later on but it has to be work that you don't need other people for.
Danger with your approach is that people need to be available for longer hours and take mini break throughout the day, id rather have a whole evening off thanks. Not an hour or two here or there and suddenly a meeting is being held at 8pm cos everyone is now available
Might work great for some but not for everyone