As it says on the tin.
Have just started building a family tree on ancestry.co.uk and with the £19.99 a month subscription seem to have gathered a rather comprehensive tree quite rapidly, alarmingly so.
I fear I’ve unwittingly accepted hints that may be mistakes or have attributed sources to the wrong person (I.e. where the name Charles has been used for different people of different generations).
Could you suggest how to stay methodical? How far back to go? Who to include and who not to bother with adding? E.g. Do I need my 3rd great uncles father in law in there at this early stage? Is it making my life harder?
Any particular quirks or strange conventions to look out for? Families reusing the names of deceased infants seems to create complications, anything similar to that?
Found a record for my third great grandmother (my dads, dads, mums, mums, mum), which fits with the rest of my tree, but then ancestry presented me with an entry on the NSW, Register of Convicts Applications to Marry 1826-1851 where she is listed under a different maiden name to the one she returns to England using (and is documented on the marriage certificate). So she goes to Australia age 6 with her convict dad (John Handebow/Handibo who stole sheep) as Eliza Handebow, sought permission to marry (George Curtis) in the same name, on return to England marries George, but their marriage certificate says Eliza March married George Curtis.
Would she have used a different name to avoid the shame of her fathers crime or something else? Is it two different people being conflated? Is there a place I can look for ideas about any strange conventions like this?
Any help appreciated, as this is very enjoyable and I’m already quite invested, have shed a few tears for the sad stories of some of my ancestors.