Another Christmas one...
This year was the turn to spend with DH’s family at the in-laws. We would be 4 households in total. After a week of thought, and no one else forthcoming, we decided to offer to take the hit and make other Christmas arrangements. It was probably between us and another household who could have easily offered. We had other family that we could go to, however we live really far away and see DH family very rarely. The other family are in childcare bubble with in-laws, so see them regularly, but I don’t think would have been as easy to make alternative plans.
We told the in-laws the decision yesterday. FIL then said “Ive looked at the map, and can see that we would be an hour out of your way to swing by ours on your way home, would love to see you outside so we can exchange presents etc. But understand it’s a v long journey (already 8 hours, with a toddler and I’m 7 months pregnant) so know it might not be possible”. It would just be the in-laws, as other two families will have gone home by then. Also likely to be more than an hour given the traffic on the 27th is going to be horrendous.
AIBU to think that, given that we are the ones who have taken the hit and made alternative plans to enable them all to spend Christmas together, they should be the ones offering to go out of their way to ensure they see us, rather than the other way round? I.e offer to meet us at a service station on our way, or even make a plan on a different day to come down to where we are staying to see us, which is in a lower tier so we could even meet them in a cafe?
They were very understanding that we might not want to make that detour, I just feel like the onus shouldn’t be on us to make sure we see each other.
Back story is I often think they act very selfishly, so I don’t know if this has just triggered me more than is reasonable?!