[quote Graphista]@DrFoxtrot yea I'm still not buying that gps would choose to fully be part of the nhs if given the choice.
Regarding services provided over the decades since the inception of the nhs gps have negotiated doing fewer and fewer services while increasing pay and improving their conditions - eg barely doing "out of hours" work.
So I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask "what are gps paid for?"
@MushMonster tread carefully when complaining about gp service it does NOT go down well and can cause problems for the patient complaining.
@bettythebuilder So sorry for your loss 
@bobbiester I agree I think appointments would miraculously become available if they were paid per appointment
If they weren't negatively financially impacted by making referrals to specialists then many patients, including me and my dd wouldn't spend decades seeing the gp for the same undx ailment multiple times yearly for treatment and trying to GET a dx, this would also free up a shit ton of appointments.
I'm always amazed at how people's lived experiences are dismissed on these threads by HCPs.
I'm no longer amazed or even surprised, saddened and frustrated and angry though yes.
GPs should be integrated, and held to account if they deliver a shoddy service.
Absolutely
I'd not be at all happy with that outsourcing to a foreign company nonsense! How much is that costing I wonder? Yet they keep pleading poverty? I don't buy it! [/quote]
There are so many factual errors in the post, I don’t know where to start.