I agree that charity shops exist to make money for charities and should be supported accordingly - however, some charities do have exorbitant "overheads" and salaries paid to CEOs that can sometimes make one a little twitchy about how much money actually goes to the recipients of said charity - there are tax breaks and other concessions that help them maximise their profits - if they achieve their aims and do the good they claim then brilliant.
In our town we have alot of charity shops - some national, some small and individually focussed - they are doing pretty well in most cases while small independent businesses fold around them.
If it wasn't for charity shops, car boot sales and ebay I'd have spent most of my adult life naked and certainly not able to hone my own style (Vintage Goth if anyone cares).
I run a niche independent Bohemian Goth shop and am hanging on by the skin of my teeth. Some of my pre-loved / vintage stock is sourced in charity shops - things that mainstream people will by-pass but my clientele will love but not necessarily find because they don't necessarily go to charity shops. I'm trying to make a living without recourse to benefits and charity myself, and it's tough at the moment - we're now the only "interesting" shop anywhere near our town centre and we have surprisingly held our own - just - since the end of lockdown. I'm hoping we can keep going.
My take on it is this - money is a tool - it's an exchange mechanism. Someone somewhere will make a profit one day, someone else will make a loss - charity shops are there to make money for their cause - I am trying to keep my head above water. Right now my landlord is the one in profit - as I build my business I might be able to spend more in charity shops and at other suppliers and someone else will benefit from that.
I'm probably not explaining this very well, but ultimately, the circulation of money in our capitalist model is the important thing on the ground. If the end result is ultimately positive and helpful that's a win and far preferable to people off-shoring their piles of money in case of what exactly?
People should shop where and when they choose for what they choose - the end result is usually a positive for a charity shop. If I buy a nice Goth jacket for 8.00 in a charity shop, and sell it on for 16.00 I've donated to charity, given someone with 16.00 the opportunity to buy it, been able to pay my rent and not had to apply for benefits. It's a many layered subject and the author of the original idea seems well meaning but naive.
And environmentally this helps. If I refrain from buying that jacket because I'm in a position of relative privilege, and no-one else fancies it, it will end up in a rag bag - it may go to landfill or be re-purposed to make someone else a profit and the charity (I know charity shop managers) would get less than 8.00 for the entire bag potentially.
Sorry, this is something that got me thinking, but I haven't changed my mind - charity shops exist to make the charity money, people of any stripe can get a bargain, and the economy keeps turning. It may not be ideal, but it's working to a degree, and frankly, with the world in the state it's in right now it's the least of our worries.