I've not looked deeply into facts and figures, however, on the surface, it seems that Covid-19 is spreading in the more deprived areas of the country. Possibly because of multigenerational households, overcrowding, the type of employment, etc. This means that children in these areas are more likely to have their schools closed or just their bubbles.
Two weeks is obviously a long time when it comes to education.
Meanwhile, children in more leafy more rural locations may find that they don't have to isolate and their education for the year may remain undisrupted. This isn't a guarantee, of course, but it may be the case.
If, for example, a child has to isolate 3 times over the course of the academic year, that is 6 weeks of education they may miss.
Surely there will be a huge difference in the education that children receive depending on where a child lives and if it is a hotspot. Do you think that eventually there will be more investment into plugging these gaps for the worse impacted children?
I think I already know the answer to this but interested to hear other views.