I'd have returned it. The very fact that she distributed among family members so very quickly tells you that she knew fine well that she had been given the wrong amount and wanted to get it spent.
She's stealing from a charity ffs! I didn't read dan to see what her punishment was, but I hope they throw the book at her. That's a dreadful thing to do,.
I d remember a case many years ago where wa woman had had a huge sum of money paid into her bank account which she knew wasn't hers. She got in touch with the bank and told them. The bank insisted that the money was indeed hers. She insisted it wasn't. they insisted it was.
This went on for some weeks (possibly months) with her telling the bank they'd made an error and the bank repeatedly telling her they "didn't make mistakes" and the money was hers.
So she spent it.
Then all of a sudden another customer of the bank with the same name asked why the transfer of £Umpteen- thousand hadn't gone into their account - and the full horror of what they had done dawned upon the the bank. They sued the first woman for the money back. She didn't have it. So they tried to effectively bankrupt her and force the sale of her house etc to repay it. She refused and this was how it ended up in court.
Happily this was in the days of LETTERS to the bank, and she had kept copies of hers, and of course, all of their replies telling her to stop nagging them- if they'd told her once they'd told her a thousand times it was her money, now bugger off! (I'm paraphrasing here
)
The judge ruled that she had done everything n her power to return the money to the bank. The bank had chosen not to accept it, and she had every right to spend it. IIRC she didn't even have to pay back the remaining money which was still in her account.
How I have dreamed of this happening to me, but alas, it never has.