I can see both sides, that a dog is a huge comfort and companion to those with and without money, but I'm closer to the side of the animal (because I'm that heartless I feel more for animals than people sometimes)
Someone in my family has an old dog in a terrible condition completely caused by his inability to pay for a vet to see it. Last time I saw the dog in this state (I do not go into his house if I can avoid it) I took the dog to the vet, got her fixed up, got her medication and gave her a damn good grooming (german shepherd, lots of stuck shed). Her ear infection cleared up because the medication worked. I paid for the follow up visit and some more drops too.
Fast forward a few months and the dog looks worse than ever, head hanging to the side, barely able to move, coat is more shed than normal coat. I'm angry. Extremely angry. I confronted him and he said he was going to get her put down because she's old and ill.
I just can't comprehend this. He made sure her last months were miserable when he could have given her up to someone who could take care of her. There wouldn't have been a bad ear infection causing her to decay early because someone else would have kept an eye on the dirt in her ears.
What do you think? Should he have done the decent thing long ago and admitted he can't afford to take care of her? (I believe someone else buys the dog food) Or was it fair to keep her and let her suffer in pain because as he says it, it's his dog and his choice?