DH and I are in the midst of a gruelling house hunt. We have been meaning to move for years but never got our arses in gear until just after lockdown, now every other bugger is looking for the same thing as us - a house in the country with plenty of space and a nice garden! We have accepted an offer on our house but few houses we like are coming up, and when they do the competition is insane.
I found a place which we both thought looked decent. However, DH did his research and found that the secondary school into whose catchment area it falls is RI across the board. (Inspection in 2017, was also RI in most areas in the previous inspection.) He is now pretty determined not to move anywhere in the catchment of that school, which eliminates quite a big part of our search area.
Now, our child is not yet born - due in January. I am a teacher so I'm aware of the importance of a quality education. However, I'm not sure if this should be grounds for ruling out a whole area. I feel like schools can change a lot in 11 years. This school is not in a 'bad' area - the catchment area is mostly nice little villages between Reading and Newbury so I'm not sure why it gets such bad results. Then again, it seems to have only gone backwards since 2013 so maybe there is some kind of major underlying problem.
What do you think? Would you rule a whole area out of your house search based on the secondary school choices of an unborn child?