I think thr blame here lies with schools. The results have been brought back to normal parameters, because such a. High percentage had been forecast to achieve more than normal, so for example 30 percent downgraded due to 30 percent more achieving more than normal.
The whole thing has a knock on, so for example unis give an offer based on results, if a student achieves it, they legally need to offer the place, but with thirty percent more achieving it they wouldn’t have the space.
Individual kids will suffer, because some would do better than their mocks, others worse, so will benefit, but they need to look at it at the macro level.
If schools had kept their overall results roughly the same as previous years this wouldn’t have happened, but we’ve had schools now predict so many higher passes that it took the system down.
So for me, schools are to blame, for submitting results saying their students would achieve thirty percent more than the school has ever achieved. Forcing the downgrading and impacting the individual.