Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Should we all lockdown again, infection rate is rising or should we shield the elderly and vunerable and support them financially while everyone else goes back to normality to save our economy.

165 replies

947EliseChalotte · 31/07/2020 18:39

Covid is not going to disappear, we will be waiting years for a vaccine. How on earth are we / the economy suppose to carry on like this ?
Yabu I'm being unreasonable
Yanbu I'm being reasonable

OP posts:
SheepandCow · 07/08/2020 07:26

The age risk starts increasing at 40, not 50.

We don't need to shield everyone over 40.
In any case shielding isn't mandatory. It's not being 'locked away' - but crucially it offers vulnerable people protection if they want it.

The criteria should be age (from 40) + risk factors. An affluent 55 year old in good health who lives rurally will be much lower risk than a low income 45 year old in poor health who lives in overcrowded housing in a deprived urban area.

drspouse · 07/08/2020 07:37

It's no good saying "sort out remote learning" when you are WFH with two young DCs who can't just use remote learning on their own, both of whom just get worse and worse behaviour wise, one of whom has SEN, the longer they are at home.
I am over 50 and have asthma. I need the schools open and the pubs shut. I need the 20-something party people arrested. The next town to ours is threatened with a local lockdown.
We could survive a two week school bubble closure but I'd have to sign off work, they won't continue to be understanding (not that they really have been).
We couldn't survive no school at all for another term.

SmileTolerantly · 07/08/2020 08:06

Nike you’ve completely misunderstood David Spiegelhalter’s work. Yes the risk of dying from this disease once you’ve caught it is roughly the same as your risk of dying in the same year but that doesn’t imply that it only kills people with 6 months to live. The majority of deaths are in people who had several years or decades of life expectancy left: they just got unlucky. The older and sicker you are the worse your odds but this is not a disease which only kills the terminally ill.

The work from the actuaries working panel quoted by a PP is accurate.

KatherineJaneway · 07/08/2020 19:07

Not everywhere YET it isn't.

You have a crystal ball?

labyrinthloafer · 07/08/2020 19:11

@KatherineJaneway

Not everywhere YET it isn't.

You have a crystal ball?

No more than you do, no Hmm
BonfireStarter · 07/08/2020 19:11

No lockdown ever again please.

boreda11 · 07/08/2020 19:14

We need schools to open in September (or next week in Scotland). If pubs being shut is needed to compensate, well worth it.

KatherineJaneway · 08/08/2020 13:08

No more than you do, no Hmm

There you are then Hmm

labyrinthloafer · 08/08/2020 13:43

@KatherineJaneway

No more than you do, no Hmm

There you are then Hmm

Hmm back Grin
KatherineJaneway · 08/08/2020 14:27
Hmm

Right back attacha Grin

labyrinthloafer · 08/08/2020 14:34

@KatherineJaneway

Hmm

Right back attacha Grin

Is this gonna be like that long hard stare out in Gavin and Stacy Grin
KatherineJaneway · 08/08/2020 14:50

Grin Maybe

labyrinthloafer · 08/08/2020 15:07

Can I let you win? Had my first glass of wine in a month and just can't take it anymore Grin Wine

KatherineJaneway · 08/08/2020 15:25

I've just had a margarita so happy to let you win 🍸Grin

labyrinthloafer · 08/08/2020 15:30

Happiness all round then. Call it a draw Smile

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread