I was going to post this in feminism but I feel strongly about this issue and hope more people start speaking up about it.
Here are some comments taken from the comments section of mainstream news outlets this week. I’ve blanked out one word for a reason.
‘Very few * are competent enough for any job’
‘ are treacherous, lying manipulative creatures’
‘All * are only good for are making sammiches (sp) and moaning’
‘If keep moaning, soon nobody will want to employ them. I won’t employ them, too much trouble’
‘They are unreliable and always having babies’
‘Im sick of * they can’t handle stress and are professional victims’
‘This article is a load of bollox. are just lazy victims and no should be in charge of a push bike let alone a country.’
Of course it’s obvious the blanked out words are either ‘woman’ or ‘women’. The reason I blanked it out is I’m asking you to imagine any mainstream news outlet replacing that word with any other group descriptor, eg. ‘Jew’ ‘Gay’ ‘Disabled’ ‘Muslim’ etc etc. It wouldn’t be tolerated. It wouldn’t be printed. (Rightly so of course).
Why then, is there such wide acceptance of these sorts of comments being published when it’s women being targeted?
(The articles in question were about women leaders doing particularly well with Covid outbreaks and women suffering disproportionately during lockdown) These are a small sample of many more vile comments and the comments got many likes.
AIBU in thinking this sort of online abuse should be treated in the same way as other forms of abuse insofar as those comments should not be allowed to be published?