Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Another (non-white, non right-wing) perspective on the concept 'white privilege'

8 replies

Melia100 · 16/06/2020 22:44

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/14/white-privilege-is-a-lazy-distraction-leaving-racism-and-power-untouched

OP posts:
PlanDeRaccordement · 16/06/2020 22:55

Good article. I especially agreed with the following excerpt:

“Politics has always relied on symbols, rituals and performance. Today, though, it can feel as if politics has been consumed by performance. Consider the way that we now talk more about “white privilege” than about “racism”. The problem of racism is primarily social and structural – the laws, practices and institutions that maintain discrimination. The stress on “white privilege” turns a social issue into a matter of personal and group psychology.

“White people, you are the problem,” writes the Chicago Tribune columnist Dahleen Glanton. “For white people,” the US-based British writer Laurie Penny insists, “acknowledging the reality of racism means acknowledging our own guilt and complicity.” White people wash the feet of black faith leaders as atonement for their sins and religiously acknowledge their guilt. Such demonstrations of public obsequiousness are performances that make individuals feel better about themselves but also keep the structures of power and discrimination untouched

And that is also what statue removals and protests have become. Actions where the true purpose is to be a virtue signalling performance which barely scratches the surface of things but wow does it feel good. It’s about keeping up appearances, not actually correcting the deep down foundations of systemic inequality, racism and injustice.

Goosefoot · 16/06/2020 22:56

Shocked, in a good way, to see this in The Guardian.

Anyone interested in other perspectives on this should try reading some Adolph Reed:

link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-017-9476-3

Even if people disagree it would be nice to have some sort of general realisation that there are various viewpoints on this issue and that they aren't just about some sort of covert bigotry.

Goosefoot · 16/06/2020 22:58

Totally Plan.

One of the things Reed says a lot is that not only does real political change require carefully looking at social causes and mechanisms of problems, it's slow, unexciting, and often requires compromise and bridge building.

Doing stuff like decolonizing the math department at Oxford - not so much.

BlueBooby · 16/06/2020 23:02

The guardian... I am shocked. I'll read it tomorrow, thanks for sharing.

Melia100 · 16/06/2020 23:17

Thanks for the Reed link, Goosefoot

OP posts:
Melia100 · 16/06/2020 23:20

I'm pretty sure Kenan Malik has been writing for The Guardian for quite a while, which makes the article's publication somewhat less surprising.

OP posts:
Wbeezer · 16/06/2020 23:22

Coleman Hughes is another thinker to check out.

PlanDeRaccordement · 16/06/2020 23:52

@Goosefoot

Precisely. It’s things like eliminating job interviews and blinding CVs from any hint of race/religion/nationality. Very boring, but would stop the common issue of BAME and immigrants being “weeded” out when applying for a job by unconscious bias at best and bigotry at worst.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page