Hi everyone,
Sorry for the long thread!
I had a rotational forceps (incl. Kiellands) delivery 5 months ago. It was traumatic. Fortunately me and my son are alive. It is taking some getting my head around, as I have a slight prolapse, but no incontinence fortunately, back not great either and pain down below. Got episiotomy and a second degree tear, but it could be a lot worse.
I know there has been some debate over Kiellands forceps, but I would like to know if anyone has any thoughts/ was told they were the best of a bad lot? Or any obstetricians on here who can give some info?
Long story short...arrived at hospital from home birth, by then been in second stage labour over 4 hours (to what they knew). Told initially they may have to do c section, then forceps, then c section. Was warned about episiotomy and incontinence from forceps...I looked alarmed at this and the anaesthetist said the doctor would be as careful as possible. Told if they had to do c section there was a greater risk of death and bladder/bowel damage as baby was low. Anaesthetist was in and out, had scan...baby looked wedged and to be honest nothing like a baby to me! Anaesthetist comes back says the doctor thinks it's better they do forceps if possible and if not a c section. I wasn't happy at this, and I'm pretty sure the anaesthetist could see I was upset. He knew I was worried about a greater risk of incontinence too. That said I was not given an option, and I had the impression that they really were not happy at having to potentially do any course of these two actions. I signed the form when asked, as I figured the c section could go a lot lot worse. I wasn't offered a choice, so without refusing and kicking up a real fuss I don't think I was going to get a section. More to the point, I wanted my baby to be safe too- I didn't want to be responsible for him getting hurt by being pushed back up for a c section. I wasn't aware of the types of forceps they would be using etc.
As I was wheeled into theatre I was told I might be put under general anesthesia for a c section if needed.
In theatre there were about 22 people, mostly looking very serious. Obstetrician examines me says we're not going to have to do a c section...some of the staff appeared to look relieved at this, I certainly wasn't!
The forceps were a bit brutal. It was difficult for the obstetrician to get my son out. He was born quiet, but tried to cry quite soon afterwards. It was pretty scary. I think he was lucky to be okay really after being wedged for so long...and he was born with a caul so he must have been extra lucky!
I ended up having a panic attack in theatre, the anaesthetist was telling me to breathe oxygen etc. I was asking when the obs would be done stitching as I was very stressed, but the anaesthetist told me that this needed to be done correctly. I was very carefully repaired.
Afterwards a midwife told me that my son's head was at a really funny angle, unbirthable and wedged. He was a big baby for me at 5 foot 3 and he was 8 pounds 8 ounces, I had an anterior placenta and I'm quite petite framed. By the time my son was born it had been nearly 24 hours since my waters had broken, so it was a long labour. So I think it was a bit of a disaster waiting to happen, however I had no information on my added risk factors from my midwife and when I asked her if it really would be ok having a home birth towards my due date ( I was getting jitters)...I was told that I would more than likely be fine.
So did anyone else have Kiellands forceps or rotational forceps and was convinced it was the best option? Any obstetricians got a view on this?
Are there some positions that make for a bad c section? I genuinely think my obstetrician seemed like a nice man, he did come round afterwards asking if I had any questions...but I was in that much of a daze that I just thanked him profusely. I was so glad my baby was ok.
By the way my thoughts go out to anyone else who's experienced a traumatic birth and any obstetricians/ medical staff dealing with these!