“I don't blame the government - they need to weed out false claimants but, IME, Capita aren't interested in the truth or fairness.”
Wtf!
Who do you think CHOSE to employ capita and similar AND who do you think sets their targets and regulations??
The govt absolutely are to blame!
Have you even seen/heard of the times certain MPs have LAUGHED and CHEERED upon learning of the difficulties it’s causing?
They are ideological opposed to the welfare state full stop and always have been.
False claims are a TINY amount of the money paid out, there’s far more UNclaimed than falsely claimed and there’s even larger amounts of tax UNPAID by large conglomerates, global companies and even celebrities.
It’s been proven by several organisations it’s not actually saving any money as claimed, that is not the real reason for the changes.
It’s a cull of the poor, sick and otherwise disadvantaged.
People are LITERALLY dying because of these policies AND they’re very deliberately covering that up.
I believe I have seen a couple articles this week about dwp workers shredding evidence relating to claimants who’ve committed suicide!
I’ve 2 degrees inc one in healthcare and I’ve worked for the civil service in a different area and learnt the hard way not to even attempt the process without support from people with expertise in the area.
I’m housebound, physically disabled and seriously mentally ill.
Last year I had to move to pip from dla. I was very fortunate to have good support from my gp and a welfare rights advisor but it still took a good month to complete the form, gather and submit the evidence. And I don’t just mean time span I mean several hours a day in that time writing and checking etc. I was very lucky and was awarded higher rate for both elements.
I’m actually a bit worried about the Scots govt taking it over having been so lucky. Not because I think them less supportive but my experience over many years of claiming due to disability means I’m always wary of change.
To answer the pp “what would you do better?”
I think it’s pretty bloody obvious what would be better!
1 Assessments are necessary yes, but they should be performed by compassionate, appropriately qualified healthcare professionals. Eg one dla assessment I had was “performed” by a fucking podiatrist! I’ve nothing wrong with my feet! And it was clear they’d zero understanding of any of my conditions!
Frankly at the moment as an ex hcp myself, I’m pretty certain that the people who are ex hcps working for these...organisations...are ones who were at risk of losing their professional registration or just plain incompetent anyway, as I’m pretty sure most would have better pay & conditions continuing to work for nhs and certainly in the private sector.
2 the LYING needs to stop!
3 if a claimant has a lifelong condition that isn’t treatable and isn’t going to improve (eg I have friends with cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, sight loss etc) then at most reassess 5 yearly. Not just for their sake but because it’s a waste of money and resources “reassessing” someone with a condition that isn’t going to improve!
4 assessments need to be in accessible places or at the claimants home if necessary. There’s been a shockingly high number of incidents where eg wheelchair users have been told to attend assessments at places they can’t even get to the buildings entry door! This happened to my friend with cerebral palsy, they sent her to a building with 16 stone steps before you were even on the same level as the building and no other access! And there’s no way of phoning them to let them know as they only give out call centre numbers that are murder to get through to.
5 the forms need to be much clearer and account for all kinds of chronic illness and disability, not skewed towards physical as they are now. The pip forms are very slightly better than the dla ones were but they're still very biased that way.
I agree a UBI would be a much better idea.
As a Scot I think if we go independent that may be something that’s introduced here.