Sorry link worked on different browser.
She is being ridiculous. She was expecting a business to give up a table at which paying customers could be sitting so she could feed her baby. She was not eating there at that time.
I agree.
She doesn’t seem to have grasped that just because a table looks available doesn’t mean it is available, and that she effectively water two tables. That’s not reasonable.
Having said that, the restaurant shouldn’t have been concerned about the table they offered her being exposed, unless she flagged it as a concern?