It's hard though, and it expects a lot from the client which not everyone is ready to give to it.
Easier to take benzos or whatever daily than look at learning coping skills to manage symptoms and processing the underlying trauma. People tend to not want to go there which is understandable.
I'm not meaning to be facetious either, it genuinely is an issue I empathise with.
Bingo!! Typical ‘blame-the-client-if-it-doesn’t-work’ mentality often to be found in CBT advocates.
After all, it couldn’t possibly be the case that the treatment modality is the wrong one for the client, could it? Let’s just bend the client to fit the modality, rather than the other way round! That will work splendidly! And if it doesn’t, it’s all the client’s fault.
CBT can be effective for some issues. Last time I looked, IAPT were reporting c50% efficacy rate for depression and anxiety. I’m not sure if the latest success rates they’ve published for pain, but i’d Be willing to bet the farm they won’t be much better, if at all. Even the 50% efficacy rate is largely for the short term, with little long-term follow up. So nothing stellar. What should the other 50% do?
In any case, for trauma it’s not ideal to rely solely on CBT. EMDR is likely to be more effective. And other forms of longer-term (but more expensive) therapy are often required to truly transform somebody’s experience of life and fully resolve issues, as opposed to simply patching people up so they are more ‘functional’ (ie still miserable, but at least they are back to work and off the government’s benefits bill).
You may not have meant to, Jiggles, but your post very much implies those who do not magically get cured with a few sessions of CBT are weak, cowardly and have themselves to blame. This is not true, in my experience. Often those struggling with pain or MH issues endure much, much more than others.
Therapy is not a guaranteed cure for anything, even when the client fully engages.