So to answer a few points.
Part of my job is to create reports for other clinicians to read and seeing patients and creating clinical reports on those patients.
My up front documents were not wafflely and largely in medical speak because I am in that field. They were four pages and would take four minutes to read because I read them out loud before I posted on here.
He was the one that was rambling to a degree. He asked me if my condition had changed since the images and I went to speak but he spoke over me and went on to another subject, got it wrong so I had to correct him on that point and it all moved on. Nothing was satifactorily concluded. He got nothing out of it himself really I imagine.
I consult in a medical/surgical but different field. I know the importance of getting the vital facts and quickly at the beginning of a consultation so a conclusion can be drawn, a diagnosis made and the patient can be got well or a prognosis made. His pattern didn't fit this either. I repeat, there was no waffle from my side or in my documents.
My GP sent a referral but there is an aspect of my problem the GP does not believe I have. I suspect the referral letter is partly to blame as it may contain this scepticism. A senior Orthopaedic surgeon has said I do have this issue and it is in not addressing this issue that has brough me to where I am now. Luckily I have now managed to get this surgeon to refer me elsewhere.
I first went to my GP in 2015 with this. I lost my job in 2017 after I couldn't rehabilitate to go back to work post surgery. Work I have done since 1979 by the way. I have been sent to various agencies and have endured such unbelievable cock ups that I am now in despair, bedridden and have anxiety and depression.
I am deteriorating fast so self preservation has me trying to get seen urgently.
When I had the surgery, I was not told it was experimental. It has since been approved by NICE but only under certain parameters and I fall outside of those parameters I believe.