My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to ask if you can answer a question re probability (Maths question)

999 replies

Fainne · 24/01/2020 00:23

So, say I have 20 cards in a pack.

I pick one. It's the Ace of Diamonds let's say for argument's sake.

I then pick another one out of the same pack of 20 cards the following day.

Am I correct in saying that the odds of me picking the same card is a multiple of the single odds?

So 1/20 x 1/20 = 1/400

?

Because I've someone telling me the odds are still 1/20 that I'll pull the same card.

OP posts:
Report

Am I being unreasonable?

153 votes. Final results.

POLL
You are being unreasonable
88%
You are NOT being unreasonable
12%
Spamantha · 26/01/2020 22:18

Roll a dice.

2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 and you win a penny
Roll a 1 and you lose a million pounds.

The odds are in your favour.

Is it a good bet to make?

Report
mummmy2017 · 26/01/2020 22:19

Many bookies when they get a big bet in go to other bookies and place the same bet to ensure they don't carry the bet.
In fact if the bookie offers better odds, on MR C winning the show 10 times the landlord could even win.

Report
chomalungma · 26/01/2020 22:26

In fact if the bookie offers better odds, on MR C winning the show 10 times the landlord could even win

The bookies would offer the landlord the correct odds because they would ask him what the odds were of winning each game and then do the maths.

Have you heard of Betfair Exchange?

You can do 1 bet at Coral and then lay it at Betfair Exchange.

But you normally end up losing money - because the odds don't necessarily reverse themselves - and also there is commission.

But Betfair people know the odds.

Report
OffToTheMoon · 26/01/2020 22:42

My question was with a 1/2 odds on a car win
The chance of 10 in a row is 1/1024


The only way this can be true is if the game show format changed and the contestant was only offered 2 doors at the start and they picked one at random.

But you don't like the game format to be changed to meet your maths, so you'll have to change your maths to meet the game show format.

Report
chomalungma · 26/01/2020 22:47

Watching an interesting video on risk aversion?

There are 2 doctors who can do your surgery.

Dr 1 - they say "There is a 5% chance you will die in this operation"
Dr 2 - they have a 95% chance of surviving if you go with me?

Who do you go with?

Report
Spamantha · 26/01/2020 23:35

Depends; if Dr 1s last 5 patients died, that means I'm safe.

Or so Consultant Mummmy2017 told me.

Report
waterlego · 26/01/2020 23:56

But do the Drs know the probability of patients dying in their care? Because if not, then that means it’s just a 50/50 chance. The pub landlord said so.

Report
TabbyStar · 27/01/2020 06:42

People tend to choose the doctor who states it positively even though the probability is the same.

Report
chomalungma · 27/01/2020 07:27

This thread has been illuminating. Thanks for all the scenarios. Mummmy either gets it or she doesn't get it. Probably

Report
mummmy2017 · 27/01/2020 09:40

I get that this has happened.
My question was based on a coin toss logic.
The landlord gave two options at odds of 1/2.
For this question with a 1/2 probability for ten throws the answer is 1/1024.
This means hard for someone to win.

You could not accept this as you were too stuck on it being dependent on the odds of winning the car, which the landlord never was interested in.
Your question did not have a 1/2 probability.

It also showed me that people's need to be right means they refuse to accept that there are things that can be independent of each other.

Report
Lweji · 27/01/2020 09:46

You could not accept this as you were too stuck on it being dependent on the odds of winning the car, which the landlord never was interested in.

But that is exactly why 1/2 may be wrong. He may not be interested, but that's crucial.

In fact, if players are equally likely to swap as not to swap, the odds of winning the car are 50%, but if players know statistics, and are more likely to swap, then the odds that the player won the car are higher than 50%.

Report
iseetodaywithanewsprintfray · 27/01/2020 09:55

"It also showed me that people's need to be right means they refuse to accept that there are things that can be independent of each other."

Like a series of coin tosses?

Report
mummmy2017 · 27/01/2020 10:01

Because the landlord was expecting the game show to be the same as all games show, with a chance for the contestant to win or lose.
There for he has choose to use odds of 1/2.
Because his bet is based on his own choice of odds, his bet is right.

He can use this same 1/2 for any gameshow where someone wins or loses .
Say tenable. Did they win the money.
The Chase. Did the team win.

Report
mummmy2017 · 27/01/2020 10:05

A single coin toss is a one off event.
Yes independent of anything else.
But you can take the result of that and ask can it happened 10 times in a row.
So it becomes dependant.
But this has nothing to do with the coin toss of the friends to see who goes first.

Report
Lweji · 27/01/2020 10:07

Because the landlord was expecting the game show to be the same as all games show, with a chance for the contestant to win or lose. There for he has choose to use odds of 1/2.

This takes us back to probability and possibility. There is a chance (possibility) that the player wins, but the associated probability is not 1/2.
In most games it's much lower, or it can be higher if the player is very good (or knows statistics).
The landlord can go on a 1/2 bet if he knows nothing about the player or the game, but it's in his interest to know more.

BTW, notice that there is no game where contestants are given a chance to win a car from only 3 doors where the show host shows them one of them.
When this situation arises, contestants have usually gone through several doors. Most times, the door with the car will already have been discarded, and in the end the players end up with three doors and a minor prize.

Report
Lweji · 27/01/2020 10:07

But you can take the result of that and ask can it happened 10 times in a row. So it becomes dependant.

Oh, dear.
That is not the definition of dependant.

Report
chomalungma · 27/01/2020 10:08

I am at work. Will this thread go into a new one. I am hoping so!!!!

Report
mummmy2017 · 27/01/2020 10:13

Oh did you win a car dear. Game 1 yes.
Oh did you win a car dear. Game 2 yes.
.......
Oh did you win a car dear. Game 10 yes.

Winning ten games in a row means the answer depends on each of the 9 shows before being won....
Or your chain of wins falls.

Report
mummmy2017 · 27/01/2020 10:18

Oh so used the a instead of the e.
Woops do.
Dependent.

Report
chomalungma · 27/01/2020 10:21

I still want to know if Mummmy would swap at the start to double her chances of winning.

Report
lotsofoysters · 27/01/2020 10:21

He can use this same 1/2 for any gameshow where someone wins or loses .
Say tenable. Did they win the money.
The Chase. Did the team win.


He can, but he'd be very wrong.

On average there's a 1 in 6 chance of a team winning on the Chase - that's how often teams win. To get 10 wins in a row in the Chase the probability would be 1/60466176 on average.
That's a lot harder than throwing 10 heads in a row.

If the gameshow was something like the Crystal Maze where most teams make it through to the end and win some amount of cash prize, the odds of winning ten times in a row are much more likely than 1/1024. So your landlord would lose out.

Report
OffToTheMoon · 27/01/2020 10:23

My question was based on a coin toss logic.
The landlord gave two options at odds of 1/2.
If the original game was guessing heads or tails from a coin toss, then your question (and answer) is correct
* ... on it being dependent on the odds of winning the car, which the landlord never was interested in.*
But, the fact of whether a contestant won a car was NOT based on a coin toss, it was based on a weighted decision. The fact that the landlord was not interested, does not change the odds. Him 'not being interested ' would cause him to lose much money if he went ahead with his bets.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

OffToTheMoon · 27/01/2020 10:27

I still want to know if Mummmy would swap at the start to double her chances of winning.
I'd be fairly confident betting that she wouldn't, not just for one game...

Report
chomalungma · 27/01/2020 10:31

Please can someone start another thread and link to this one. I really need closure

Report
OffToTheMoon · 27/01/2020 10:33

If Hussain Bolt was running a race against me, do you really think my chances of winning are 50/50? After all, i could win or lose?
So when you are telling your pub landlord there's a race between 2 people, and the result is one person (me) could either win or lose, do you think he'd be wise to bet on me winning 10 times in a row at 1/1024?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.