The lack of empathy which is inevitably displayed by some on threads like these really saddens me.
Debt isn't simply about living 'beyond your means' for the sake of unnecessary fripperies for many but about absolutely unavoidable expenses which have to be addressed - often for the sake of continued employment (in the case of replacing or repairing a vital car) or one's health (in the case of replacing a boiler for heating and hot water).
Even those who try to save for a rainy day, and particularly those on a low income, are increasingly finding their savings (if they've been able to save at all) simply aren't keeping up with the cost of living when it comes to having to break into them. This is compounded of course by having to live in the here and now in the meantime where ever increasing prices for just about everything you can think of - and generally stagnant wages - mean that the amount many can save diminishes, or is prevented altogether. Thus greatly increasing the possibility of incurring debt for all sorts of essential reasons.
It's all very well talking about responsible choices and obviously I'm not advocating taking a loan for a fancy holiday if you'd struggle to repay it but what a number of people refuse to recognise is that some people have little or no choice when it comes to accruing debt. No one's yet mentioned, I think, those in financially or otherwise abusive relationships.... I've seen a number of threads over the years here where a woman's only chance of escape has been a credit card (for deposits, moving costs etc) If she can muster the courage to leave surely it's preferable to go into debt doing it than stay and endanger herself or her children?
I'm also saddened by the holier than thou attitude of people whose circumstances have, altogether, been 'privileged' enough to avoid debt. Privileged doesn't necessarily mean you're living in luxury but if you've been able to avoid debt by being relatively frugal, you've still been fortunate in being able to do that. Various circumstances will have combined to let you manage.
And funnily enough, the age old advice of getting a' better' job isn't that simple. If you can, then of course you'd be foolish to turn it down but plain fact is there aren't enough so called better jobs for everyone who'd like one. And if there were, who the heck would be providing the services low paid work typically entails? If people can't manage a basic standard of living on a full-time wage then we should be questioning both individual employers and the wider economy about that, because these are jobs that need to be done..... instead of berating people struggling to make ends meet on a daily basis who sometimes (increasingly often) have NO choice but to go into debt.
I appreciate it'd be impossible to accurately analyse exactly why debt is accrued but I'd be very interested to see what percentage (of unmanageable) debt is taken out for arguably unnecessary reasons (holidays, brand new top of the range cars) and how much is taken out because people have no other option. As in continuing to travel to their job when there is no alternative employment within walking distance, and when they can't afford to move closer. And I'd like to compare those reasons across, say, the last five years, with data from 15 to 20 years ago.
As for the idea that if people can afford to service debt, then they can afford to save in anticipation of future expenses, another poster has already eloquently explained why that theory isn't straightforward. Strangely, very few low paid people can realistically 'afford' their debt repayments but what else can they do? In practice this means they will go without in other areas in order to do so, making an already stressful life even more unpleasant. Reducing heating and eating (both quality and quantity) comes to mind. Swerving health issues because you can't afford prescription charges or dental fees. Selling what you can (usually for a pittance). Until eventually there's nothing left to give. Hence we see increasing reliance on food banks and other types of charity.
If life was a level playing field then I'd have more sympathy with those who believe debt is easily avoidable but it's not. Far from it.