We live in a slightly crappy area with substandard schools. We have a son who has just turned 1. DH does not want to move house at all but I reckon I might be able to convince him to move one more time. I don't really want to send my son to the local "Requires improvement" primary that was in special measures until recently and I want to move anyway as I am sick of my long commute to work.
Where I really want to live is a particular road in our city, overlooking beautiful woods, posh area, lots of amenities, short walk to town and to my work. The only downside is that the local state school has a teeny tiny catchment area - it's literally a couple of hundred metres as the crow flies. One end of my perfect road is usually within the catchment area, and one end isn't. Unfortunately the houses down the end with the catchment area tend to be about £50k more than we can afford unless they are in a state of disrepair and I think wherever I was on that road I would be nervous that we might be a few metres outside the catchment area for that year anyway. We really need to be in the catchment area because the next nearest schools are in the wrong direction for my work and quite far away (we don't drive).
I've been spending some time plotting. The issue is that I think we need to move before DS starts school in a few years but I want to make sure we are within the catchment area. I have been thinking that when DS turns 4 we could sell our current house, rent a house in the catchment area for a year or two whilst we wait for one of the houses on the road I like to come on the market. This would also give us the bonus of being chain free when buying the house.
Is it be bonkers to be so fixated on this already? Or is it sensible? I think DH will think it is all too much effort but he doesn't have the same sharp-elbowed middle class upbringing as me.
Also, has anyone done this and did it work or go badly?