Apologies but I’m shamelessly posting for traffic.
I have been engaged to my DP for 5 years (been together 7) and we have decided that next year we will tie the knot.
We are saving for a mortgage so we want a very low key / low stress wedding (ideas welcome!) Only family and very close friends for ceremony.
We thought of having the ceremony in a registry office and then I was looking at hiring a place overlooking the beach for the reception. (Very reasonably priced) My DP then said that we should just stick with having a ceremony and no reception (his point is that we want to keep costs down and the only ‘important’ bit is the ceremony.
I get what he’s saying but isn’t it the ‘done thing’ to have a reception, feed the people kind enough to come etc or is it reasonable to do what he is saying? I said if he wants to do that then maybe we should do it on our own and then hire a hall at some point after we have bought the house and celebrate both with family and friends but he understandably wants his parents at the wedding.
We want to get married so that’s not the AIBU bit. I guess WIBU to not have a reception?
Sorry for rambling!