Haven't you been reading the news about the 85,000 retail jobs lost?
Yes, I've just been reading that.
The headline is a bit misleading because the 85,000 is an equivalent figure - "there is a 2.8% fall in the number of retail employees in the three months to the end of September, compared with the same period a year before" - which the British Retail Consortium has calculated as being equivalent to 85,000 job losses.
"Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the British Retail Consortium, which published the retail employment numbers, urged the government to provide more help for retailers as she said the number of retail jobs had been declining for more than three years."
What is confusing is that the British Retail Consortium warned the government at the end of last year that the proposed immigration rules would leave the retail industry short of staff - even though retail jobs had been declining for more than four years;
“Setting the main cut-off for hiring workers from outside the UK at £30,000 would leave retailers and their supply chains recruiting from a very small pool of domestic labour, the vast majority of whom are already in work,” BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said.
"The Home Office said the scheme aims to fill staff shortages in various sectors–such as retail shop floor staff–once free movement ends after the UK’s divorce from the EU comes into affect."
"BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said [in a letter to Sajid Javid] that there were at present 92,000 retail industry vacancies and that “meeting this demand is difficult without resourcing from the widest possible labour pool”.
Therefore, it would appear that if people are losing their jobs in the retail sector they must be finding work in other sectors pretty quickly - otherwise there wouldn't be so many unfilled vacancies.