This is a current hot debate where I am right now; so interested to hear opinions:
Background:
Our local community centre rents out rooms by the hour for community groups; Youth club, table tennis, am dram rehearsals, that sort of thing. And the centre is also managed and run entirely by volunteers of which I am one.
A volunteer will come into the building, make any changes to the room that are required (moving tables and chairs etc.) and then stay for the duration of the booking before locking up afterward. Pretty standard.
As it happens; one of our volunteer key holders also runs one of the groups that meet in the building; so opens up and locks up. Now here’s the who is being unreasonable:
The group is booked in and pays for 18:00-20:00. But the volunteer often gets to the centre for 16:00, sets up and then sits in the office working on her laptop until 18:00 - she says she would rather come straight from work than go home and come back out. Sometimes she will do odd things around the building that are on the jobs board - like mop bathroom, or clean the office etc.
Some people on the committee think she’s taking advantage of the fact she has a key and shouldn’t be in that early when she only pays from 18:00. Her argument, which I agree with, is that it’s no different from any other volunteer coming in early to set up (which has happened for other things without issue). Her group aren’t in until just before six so it shouldn’t be an issue.
She does open and lock up for two other nights in the week for groups she has nothing to do with and helps out at fundraisers and things - So isn’t a case of just doing things for her group iyswim?
So which side is being unreasonable?