I'm going to try and keep this as short and sweet as possible because I'm trying to decide if I'm being unreasonable in wanting to complain about a GP at my practice.
Last week I came down with a horrible upper back spasm. Pain easily an 8/10, couldn't straighten my head, paracetamol and ibuprofen plus gels and deep heat/cold doing nothing to help. Went to the walk-in and was examined and diagnosed with a severe back spasm. Sadly, they could not prescribe what I needed - diazepam. I have a small history of these type of spasms which I need to take diazepam for. Especially as I am allergic to all opiates and nothing can even take the edge off the pain. So walk in recommends I speak to my doctor's when they open the next day for a prescription, and that he'd send my notes over.
After a sleepless night I ring the surgery and ask for a note to be passed though to the GPs. I confirmed the notes regarding my physical examination and diagnosis had arrived.
The GP refused to prescribe anything and told me to live with it. I rang back and complained that it was unacceptable and I couldn't manage to live in this kind of pain. They passed another note through to the GP. In the meantime I rang 101 who contacted my surgery and the doctor finally prescribed but at a lower dosage than recommended. I am now on the mend after 4 days of the stuff.
Would I be unreasonable to complain about this GP? She has form for not prescribing medications which are then prescribed by other doctors and specialists. Other patients may not be as forceful and clued into their care as I am and I worry for them.
Thanks for any perspective, I'm obviously very close to this.