It's a bit U to ask for medical advice from virtual unknowns, but perhaps some knowledgeable MNers could least point me in the right direction.
My question is does dd need urgent care, or do I need to give the antibiotics more time to take effect?
Earlier this year 16yo dd had an abscess in a kidney. She had had no UTI symptoms, just fever and malaise, and severe backache after the antibiotics cleared up the fever. Resulted in hospital admission, IV antibiotics, eventually discharged with an all-clear. But at her follow-up I insisted that dd is not 100%, and they agreed further investigations (due in October).
She now has another UTI. Again, no UTI symptoms, and this time just backache with no fever. GP prescribed co-amoxiclav on Friday, so she's 48h into the treatment and feels no better.
When dd was discharged from hospital, I was told to have a very low threshold for bringing her to A&E - basically to bring her in if she had any fever.
But she has no fever. She just doesn't seem to have responded to the antibiotics yet. IME you notice an improvement after 48h on antibiotics, even if you don't feel completely well.
So what should I do? Wait or go to A&E? Who can I ask for advice?