"Men are visual creatures” is almost exclusively used to excuse sexually inappropriate behaviour by men."
"It’s not actually true."
That used to very much be the case and still is to an extent.
Which is why what a sexual assault victim's clothing would be brought up in court.
Street harassment and older men being pervy around young women is still blamed on this.
It was used as an excuse to drap a half naked woman over anything advertised.
Women who were more sexually subtle would be branded 'thinking man's crumpet'.
Women were seen as deviant if we picked up someone we fancied for a one night stand. We were supposed to look for the inner qualities of men.
I think the not noticing things is to do with not being fully checked in to family relationships and the handing over of the mental load. They don't bother because they are let off with not bothering.
Men do get more sexually aroused by looking at images, than women do, but that never justified the behaviour that went with it. We'll never know how much of all of this is still socialisation. Now Women have more sexual freedom a lot of the old theories are debunked. How women sexually conduct themselves is from a mixture of sources, socialisation, stigma and a fear of pregnancy etc, very little to do with biology.
Men are visual creatures” is almost exclusively used to excuse sexually inappropriate behaviour by men.