Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To buy a share of freehold flat or house? (London)

10 replies

TherapieTaxi · 23/09/2019 19:09

Sorry - long!

TLDR: mid-twenties single first time buyer: should I buy share of freehold flat or house in up-and-coming area? Which is better investment/better idea?

Hi all,

I posted a similar thread yesterday (about house-buying) so sorry if this seems like a bit of a repetition from what I posted previously.

In a nutshell, I’m a single first-time buyer and am looking to buy in London where I work.

My plan was always to buy a house.

This is because houses are totally owned by the homeowner (normally no lease, unlike a lot of flats, unless house is new-build) and are normally much more spacious than flats.

Houses always seemed like a much better long-term investment than a flat because of this. I was thinking of perhaps renting it out eventually although not sure.

My plan was also to try and buy in up-and-coming area (e.g. Forest Gate) and I’ve done a lot of research into this.

I’d be happy living in that sort of area as it’s so well connected and will be even better with Crossrail. Although I know the area is slightly dodgy, so I’d feel a bit nervous coming home late.

Anyway, I’ve been thinking that actually a flat may suit me better right now, as I’d be buying on my own.

A house is obviously a lot of work to maintain (esp with a garden), and most of the houses I’ve looked at are more reasonable because they need a bit of work done to them. And I’d feel less lonely living somewhere like a flat, where I’d have other people in my building and be able to afford somewhere more central than I could with a house.

Even if I bought in somewhere well connected like Forest Gate, I’d still be far away form friends and family living in London and would probably feel quite vulnerable living on my own in a house.

If I buy a flat, I’d definitely prefer to buy a share of freehold flat rather than leasehold, as I don’t want to have to worry about extending the lease. I know share of freehold flats are harder to come by though!

What are your thoughts?

Is a share of freehold flat as good an investment as a house? I think it makes the most sense for me right now. Also, buying a property is obviously a massive financial commitment and I don’t want to come home every night stressing about the place I’ve bought and hating it.

OP posts:
TherapieTaxi · 23/09/2019 19:26

Bump :)

OP posts:
TherapieTaxi · 23/09/2019 20:37

Anyone? :)

OP posts:
MoodLighting · 23/09/2019 20:43

Share of freehold is better but still potentially a headache to manage. If you have the funds, do buy the house. Get a lodger and use the extra cash to hire people in to do the garden etc.

MoodLighting · 23/09/2019 20:45

If you do buy a flat check out the leasehold knowledge partnership or any of the new groups dedicated to the leasehold scandal on Facebook or online. They will help you to choose a competent and skilled surveyor.

WhyBirdStop · 23/09/2019 20:51

I absolutely hated living in a flat you couldn't pay me to buy another one. Damage to communal areas caused by other residents (tenants) massive bill shared between those who owned freehold, dealing with management companies, higher turn over of neighbours etc. If you can buy a house buy one, you can always rent a room out, for company and cash. A friend of mine has just done this in North London and her lodger is our other friend's partner's sister.... There's always someone you know or friend of a friend looking to rent in London.

TherapieTaxi · 23/09/2019 21:53

Thanks Why and Mood - you both make very good points.

My head is telling me to buy a house but I just worry that I’ll be lonely. Although getting a lodger is certainly an option.

OP posts:
NotStayingIn · 23/09/2019 22:05

I think you are overthinking it and losing sight of the fact you are buying a home. They are SUCH different propositions, surely you must have a preferred option?!

A house, a flat mate, a slightly less great area, further out, more space, etc.

A flat, more central, having your own space, smaller, etc.

They are miles apart. What do you prefer? What, if you had to decide in a split second, would your instinctive answer be.

Yes sure, you can think about what will be the best financially. But both will work out fine. Both can easily be sold, rented out. Both in London will increase in value (probably). It’s your ‘home’ first and foremost.

NotStayingIn · 23/09/2019 22:09

(For context, for me the though of being further out and having a lodger and living in a less nice area was a complete no. Bought a small flat more central and still love it many years later. Love being central, not sharing my space, living somewhere with amazing restaurants etc. But it’s just what you prefer. It’s also more then doubled in value but that’s not the point as I am not selling anyway.)

MojoMoon · 23/09/2019 22:18

Don't overthink it.

It will be your home and your life. That is more important than the possible investment value.

Most flats are leasehold and it is absolutely fine.

Choose somewhere you want to live. A short commute and being near friends are likely to be considerably more beneficial to your well-being and mental health than owning a freehold would.

TherapieTaxi · 23/09/2019 22:37

Thanks so much Not and Mojo - I agree I’m probably overthinking it!

My gut reaction would be to get a house but have a lodger too so I’m not living completely on my own. Just need to find a lodger who I trust and get on well with/am happy to live with.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread