Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To buy a house without my partner?

44 replies

WalkiesPlease · 16/09/2019 12:34

Sorry as this is quite long and some parts don't seem relevant but I'm trying to avoid drip feeding. I’ve seen a vaguely similar post going round but I’m in the other person’s shoes. I’ve recently come into a significant amount of money from the death of a parent. I’m in my early twenties and this money is more than enough to buy a house.

FWIW, me and my partner have been together for 4 years and I love him so much, like any couple we've had our rough patches, but I trust him more than anyone, he treats me so well and makes me laugh every day. Neither of us are ready for marriage just yet but we talk about it fairly often and we’ve discussed having children and what we’d like our future to look like.

The only thing that’s ever been an issue for us is money. We’re from quite different backgrounds – he left school at 16 and has done mostly manual labour, whereas I went to Uni and graduated a few years ago. As it stands, I already earn more money than him and most likely always will (this is something we’ve both acknowledged). This doesn’t bother me in the slightest; he is hardworking and ambitious and is doing really well in his field.

2 years ago, we started renting a place together, we’ve been lucky that it’s very cheap, but he rarely has any money left by the end of the month and is saving very little, whereas I can afford to be a bit more indulgent and still save a good chunk. Realistically, if we want to buy a house together and put in equal amounts, it’s going to take a good 7-8 years to do that and we’ll be in our thirties by then. I could put down more than him and we could split things fairly e.g. 65/35 to me, but I don’t want to make this kind of financial commitment until marriage.

I feel like the most sensible option is for me to buy a house now, just in my name, and then we could live in it together. Without renting, he could save up enough money for a deposit on a house we could both put our names on and then I could sell the (hypothetical) current house without a chain and keep that money for whatever I want to use it for in the future, which may be our mortgage, children, holidays, nice treats, etc.

It’s just that after seeing another post about ‘hoarding’ your inheritance I don’t know if this counts as being stingy or non-committal? At the end of the day, my inheritance was given to me by a parent who loved me, and I know they would want to me to be careful with it. I want us to be partners and go through the excitement of buying a house together but at the same time I don’t want to fund our entire life together. Nor do I want to hold the money above his head. At least if the house was mine and we were to break up, I wouldn’t suffer financially, and he would have a lump sum of savings that would mean he was okay too –not that I ever want to!

OP posts:
AmIRightOrAMeringue · 16/09/2019 13:59

The other thread was a bit different in my opinion because it wasnt as much about the inheritance but the fact that the richer partner was happy to have his lower earning partner pay half of everything and doing so was putting her into debt, which most people agreed was unfair as in a couple lots of people either split bills in proportion to earnings, or work it out so they get a roughly equal amount of spending money left over. Her thread read like he didnt give a shit about her.

You clearly care about what's fair. I think it's normal before marriage and children not to pool assets. Keeping major assets separate isn't the same as taking advantage of someone financially. If you havent yet made the decision to be together for ever then why would you give him half your money.

I think if you are charging him less than market rent and he is getting to save then it's a situation that will benefit him as well so he is benefiting from it but indirectly

WalkiesPlease · 16/09/2019 17:54

Wow, thank you everyone. There are a lot of really helpful, measured responses on here; I'm glad everyone mostly seems to be in agreement with each other. I brought this up with my partner and he was actually really excited about the idea, it means it will be easier for us to get onto the property market as a couple and he's comfortable with the idea of coming up with an agreement via a solicitor, so it's worked out nicely.

I'd usually go to my Mum for this sort of thing, but seeing as this wouldn't be happening if she was still here, I'm grateful to everyone who's taken the time to give me some good, solid advice. Thanks!

OP posts:
NearlyGranny · 16/09/2019 17:58

He sounds lovely - and so do you! Have fun house-hunting.

GabriellaMontez · 16/09/2019 18:03

Yanbu.

This is very different to the other thread. He squirrelled it all away in his name.

You plan to buy a house which will give him the opportunity to save on rent.

Durgasarrow · 16/09/2019 18:03

Yes yes yes promise me you will keep the money separate and buy the house in your name. And follow all the good financial advice that people are giving you above. Reading Mumsnet has given me nightmares about the kinds of financial troubles that women get themselves into by relying on men. Make sure that your man really does amass a nest egg if you let him live with you rent free--that is a remarkably generous and unnecessary offer.

paddingtonbearsmarmalade · 16/09/2019 18:35

Sounds sensible to me - my boyfriend inherited enough for a substantial deposit and bought the house we live in a year ago. He pays mortgage, I pay all bills and we split food. This was because I refused to put money into a house that wasn’t mine, or rent from a partner (felt weird), but also didn’t want to not pay my way - it works out roughly the same as if we split the costs anyway. A friend of his owns her house, pays mortgage & splits bills with her partner, so pays a bit more but is safe in her claim on the house.

I am happy to buy furniture and/or split the costs of white goods etc (tbh most of the furniture is mine anyway!) but won’t pay for home improvement - we want to get the kitchen done but will wait until he can afford it. The slightly more complex aspect for me is that I have some really strong ideas about what I’d like to do with the house but I respect it’s his property, therefore he has final say. I could probably veto anything I really hated but don’t want him to feel like he can’t make his own decisions on what he wants. I would like to continue saving for my own place or a bigger joint purchase (once we’ve resolved the ‘having children’ question). If I could be the one to own the house, I’d do it in a heartbeat so go for it!

autumnleaves99 · 16/09/2019 19:36

I agree with everyone else, but I would also ask you to think now about the future and whether you'll be happy with him earning less than you in the long term. If you do decide to have children, life may change quite a lot from what it is now. I know lots do it, but full time work is blooming hard work when you have kids and if you'd like to go part time but can't because he's not earning enough, will you start to resent him? Me and DH both earn good salaries, but with the cost of childcare and needing a bigger house to accommodate us and our 2 kids, it's really only possible for me to do part time hours because my DH is earning a decent amount. Just something to think about while you're thinking about the future.

Waveysnail · 16/09/2019 19:39

Sounds perfectly sensible. You buy house in your name and pay mortgage. Split rest of Bill's allowing him to have savings. Then if anything should happen he has savings to fall back on and you have your house. Best case scenario you then get married and have kids so really doesnt matter who's name is on mortgage

EmiliaAirheart · 16/09/2019 19:54

Given that they’ll have housing well under control, @autumnleaves99, I think you can leave the scaremongering aside.

PonderingPanda · 16/09/2019 20:12

Friend of mine got a Deed of Trust drawn up prior to buying with her partner as she was putting in 70/30 in her favour.... lucky she did as after many years of marriage and children they are getting divorced

Inferiorbeing · 16/09/2019 21:20

My friends did exactly this and it works out well for them, she is setting up her own business (she already has a well paid job) and he works for NMW and had no deposit. They just had a cohabitation agreement drawn up for his "rights"

Trebla · 16/09/2019 22:14

Sorry to hear you lost a parent.

You could buy an investment, rent it and the rental income be a joint benefit towards saving for your own place. You'd still have any capital gain.

I dont think I'd buy somewhere for you to love in together unless he had some "ownership" the risk for the balance to thrown on all levels is too high. A home is personal, it's a safe space. You need security in that. I'd not like to be a "guest" in my partners place.

I'd by a rental. Use the income to put towards purchasing a shared house some time in the near future and then you'd have at least half of that place too. It also benefits and shows a commitment to him without reducing your asset.

SpecialKRocks223 · 16/09/2019 22:24

I would buy a house outright in your name only, both live in it rent / mortgage free and split the bills whilst saving for a second property, eventually buy it 50/50 and rent out your first house. If you split up you can sell that between the two of you and you'll still have your first home to fall back on.

I am sorry for your loss x

SunniDay · 17/09/2019 17:20

Hi OP,
If you go ahead and buy your own house please always keep an up to date will (while you are not married at least).

I had a lovely friend whose partner had his own place when they met. They had been together over 10 years and lived as "man and wife" with her sharing the mortgage/bills and home renovations (effort as well as cost). When he died she had to vacate the property so it could be sold by his next of kin. Perhaps she could have gone to court and fought this - I don't know - but she didn't. At that awful time when she had lost her life partner (after an amount of time specified by them) she moved out with nothing and started her life over again.

Rachelover60 · 17/09/2019 17:28

Very sensible decision, op. Good luck to you with your house purchase. Your partner sounds great btw.

Batqueen · 17/09/2019 17:35

Another reason why it would be better for both of you - first time buyers get tax benefits. It sounds like you are in a position to make use of them through your savings etc whereas your partner isn’t. He should protect his first time buyer status so that if he lives in your house and is saving that it is in a lifetime isa or help to buy isa.

PettyContractor · 17/09/2019 17:45

Not only should you buy the house in your name, but you should never get married to him. If you never separate this needn't matter financially, as you can arrange finances so he gets equal benefit from your money while living with you. It's only if you divorce that marriage will make a big difference, and in your case, it will be a hugely adverse difference.

2girlsandagap · 17/09/2019 17:47

Buy it in your name or if you must add him put it under a business mortgage.
Dh got stung quite badly by his ex where he payed entire deposit of £20k from an inheritance and his ex contributed £1k...4 months after moving in together her affair got discovered and she walked away with a pay off of £17k (50% of available equity) which isn’t as bad as it could have been but still is decent considering she literally only paid for the survey and solicitor for the original purchase and left him with a mountain of debt from having to buy her out.

You may well stay together forever but make sure you’re protected in case your situation changes.

madcatladyforever · 17/09/2019 17:52

I can tell you from experience put it in your name only, you have no idea what the future will bring. 50% divorce now. I just got divorced from the "love of my life" whom I'd been with for 20 years and stupidly put MY house in joint names. Needless to say he has buggered off with his share without putting any in. This means I have to downsize and early retirement is no longer possible plus I have bad health.
You can be in love but think with your head and always protect your financial interests first.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page