No, the school needs to organise activities on school premises or trips they can walk to.
Well, at my DC’s school they could certainly walk to den-building in the woods but that would be it. There’s nothing else to walk to. They could have “activities on school premises”, and they do, but the school hall is too small for most purposes e.g. visiting theatre is a problem and there are things you can’t replicate on the premises. There’s no public transport they could use.
School cannot afford a coach for every opportunity the children could have. They cannot charge the parents £15-20 transport for every local trip to a nearby school who is hosting an activity on their premises (to save money by banding together with other schools) or to sporting tournaments or musical workshops or charitable or other educational opportunities.
The alternative is the children don’t go anywhere off the premises. That’s fine but I’d rather put up with a bit of inconvenience and shuffling favours for transport so that my DC can have a really interesting and rewarding primary school education.
I work, my DH works, the majority of parents at my DC’s school work, I would say. It is a big pain. But when parents are canvassed for opinions the majority say they’re happier to sort transport than not run trips.
If the school was in a city with transport and opportunities close by then I’d feel different. But then perhaps I’d also feel fine about den-building in that scenario as it’s something a lot of inner city school children might not get to do otherwise.
Generally I think parents need to realise schools are in a pretty difficult situation and it’s not a case of forcing them to provide transport - they might just decide not to bother with any trips at all.