Forgetting the obvious 'neighbourly' problems..If these people are feckin' around and having their rent and council tax paid and having some kind of income support too, then no, YANBU.
If there is a genuine disability which prevents them from working, then obviously none of the above applies.
Our benefits culture is crap, IMO. We have generations of families where I live, who have no expectations in life whatsoever. 'Poverty of aspiration' is the accepted term, I believe.
We run a daycare nursery and have recently given free care for 5 months to a family who have been with us since we opened, when the dad lost his job and until he started working again. These parents, like us, are both working their butts off to be able to afford a small house in London.
A couple of weeks ago a twenty something mother with a two year old came to look around our nursery. She explained that she wanted her daughter to go to nursery for three days a week so that 'she could have some time to herself.'
Fine. Many of our parents want their children to come to nursery to socialise, give them a break,whatever..
We got to the signing up part and discussed fees. The woman then told us that she couldn't pay because she was claiming benefits.
So. Who should pay for her daughter's place? And, more importantly, why does a seemingly able-bodied person feel that anyone else should?