I’m just going to go ahead and re-post two of my posts from yesterday, because we still have new posters wandering on to the thread, not reading a damn word of the very significant posts which explain succinctly exactly why women’s choices in menstrual products shouldn’t be limited, even for green reasons, and just thoughtlessly writing, “Sorry, (they’re not) YABU, it’s an inconvenience (it’s not), you’ll have to get used to it (we can’t), what did women do before plastic applicators, eh? (they were physically injured/suffering, that’s what they did)”
My posts from yesterday:
Well, if this thread proves anything, it is that the pain of women will be continued to be dismissed, including by other women themselves.
Until you have a true gynaecological issue, it is clear that there is no understanding of how under-diagnosed and under-funded female medical issues are.
“They can prescribe plastic applicator tampons for those who truly need them.” Yeah, sure they will. Yo, my fellow endometriosis or vaginismus sufferers, how many years did it take you guys to have a medical professional take you seriously enough to diagnose you? It was 11 years for me.
I’m thinking about my local supermarket. There are a couple of shelves on one aisle dedicated to plastic applicator tampons, which, it has been proven time and again on this thread, that some women DO ACTUALLY NEED.
In contrast:
There are three full aisles of fruit and veg and bags of salad, the majority of which are wrapped in plastic. NOBODY NEEDS to have plastic-wrapped fruit and veg.
There is currently an aisle of garden ornaments, a lot of which are made from plastic. NOBODY NEEDS plastic lawn ornaments.
There is a full aisle of magazines, most of which are wrapped in plastic, containing smaller items also made of plastic. NOBODY NEEDS plastic magazine tat, or for multiple magazines to come wrapped in plastic together.
There are two aisles full of toys for children, the very vast majority made from plastic. NO CHILD NEEDS to have toys made of plastic. They NEED toys, but these could be made from other materials, such as fabric or wood.
There are three full aisles of soft drink and squash varieties, ALL of which are in plastic bottles with plastic caps! NOBODY NEEDS to have over a hundred choices of non-essential drinks that come in plastic bottles.
All of these areas of the supermarket are much, much greater in size than the shelves of women’s sanitary protection. All of which are designed to be marketed towards both sexes, also. By logic, if supermarkets truly wish to reduce their single-use plastics, they really should select at least one of these areas, alongside many others I could name, first.
But, no, instead they have selected to “tackle” the issues of plastic applicator tampons first, because women are always the easy target. It is a feminist issue. And it is unfair, because, as has been explained many times on this thread, there is a medical need to have plastic applicator tampons remain on the shelf for many women. At least until research is properly invested into women’s health!
Why are we debating between each other as to whether that other woman on the thread NEEDS to have a plastic applicator, IS she using it correctly, WHY can’t she just use a moon cup or her fingers?
Why aren’t we asking each other why plastic packaging on food can’t come first? Or frivolous purchases, such as lawn ornaments? Or the enormous and plastic-heavy toy industry? These would actually have a real and immediate impact, and wouldn’t be harmful towards their consumers.