Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To point out that starting a thread with a negative comment about the Daily Mail does nothing to stop them?

49 replies

HennyPennyHorror · 25/06/2019 22:57

People keep starting threads with "The Daily Mail are Wankers" and so on in the hope that it will somehow stop them using their thread as "news"

It does nothing. They just fish the bits out that they want to use and ignore the defamatory comments.

They don't copy and paste entire threads you know.

Even a user name like "DailyMailArses" will just result in them saying "A mumsnet user says she hates her neighbour because..."

So stop it.

OP posts:
HennyPennyHorror · 25/06/2019 22:57

And YAHOO takes our threads too...so what about them?

OP posts:
mouldyhousemouldylife · 25/06/2019 23:01

A lot of places take threads from here actually, but I think it's more about the fact the DM are scummy cunts.

IhateBoswell · 25/06/2019 23:03

I don't actually do it myself, but your so stop it makes me want to.

HelloGabriel · 25/06/2019 23:11

I was wondering about this too; I've seen them screen-grab some quotes before to put within their 'articles' but it'd be a piece of piss for them to simply cut out the 'Daily Mail are a bunch of hoof-wanking-bungle-cunts'?

Breakaplate · 25/06/2019 23:17

No opinion but 'hoof wanking bungle cunts' is my new most favourite sentance.

StreamsFullOfStars · 25/06/2019 23:27

Well it doesn't stop them because Mumsnet own the copyright to your posts and they sell them to the Daily Mail. They've previously confirmed this when I've asked, but funnily enough don't like to advertise it ..

HelloGabriel · 25/06/2019 23:27
Grin
HennyPennyHorrorisabossyboots · 25/06/2019 23:29

It probably just makes them feel a bit better about it. Sometimes being petty is pleasing.

Dairymilkmuncher · 25/06/2019 23:29

I thought people were doing it to prove they weren't journalists GrinGrin

Tallgreenbottle · 25/06/2019 23:31

They're doing it to signal they're not a journalist, or whatever wanky clickbait writers for that shit-rag are called these days.

So yabu OP, for being a muppet.

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 25/06/2019 23:35

I don't actually do it myself, but your so stop it makes me want to

I agree

I’m not much of a thread starter

But fuck me do i want to start one now

StreamsFullOfStars · 26/06/2019 07:20

It does feel so intrusive though. You should be able to post on a forum like this without the owner of the forum being able to publish your posts elsewhere, particularly in national newspapers that are read by a much wider and different audience to those that would use an online forum like this.

Nanny0gg · 26/06/2019 07:29

@StreamsFullOfStars

I didn't think there was copyright on a public forum.

Sparklingbrook · 26/06/2019 07:34

If you don't want it in the Daily Mai/Yahoo etc or discussed on This Morning/Loose Women /Jeremy Vine then don't post it on a public forum. Simple.

StreamsFullOfStars · 26/06/2019 07:36

Yes, you assign it to Mumsnet when you post. So they own all the posts and can do with them what they like, including selling interesting threads to the DM.

RottnestFerry · 26/06/2019 07:38

MN is a public forum. Fair game to anybody, not just the DM.

They might be on a sticky wicket if they started cutting and pasting posts but there is nothing to stop them reporting what has been said on MN.

StreamsFullOfStars · 26/06/2019 07:38

Sparkling brook, that's true but most people seem to be labouring under the misapprehension that posts are stolen when they're actually being sold. I think internet sites should be forced to be more open about this.

Trills · 26/06/2019 07:39

Mumsnet own the copyright and can (and have) use it for books etc.

Newspapers don't need to pay or ask permission to quote threads in order to comment on them, it'll come under fair use. They aren't "selling threads to the Daily Mail".

BarryBarryTaylor · 26/06/2019 07:41

If MN are making a profit out of selling posters threads then yes that definitely should be said. That’s incredibly shameful of MN if true

RottnestFerry · 26/06/2019 07:42

Why do people think the posts are being sold?

Sparklingbrook · 26/06/2019 07:44

No idea Rottnest. Confused

LaMarschallin · 26/06/2019 07:45

They're doing it to signal they're not a journalist, or whatever wanky clickbait writers for that shit-rag are called these days.

Lucky those wanky clickbait writers for that shit-rag aren't cunning enough to post things like "The DM is shit" just to try to fool us, isn't it?

I've never understood this either. If anything, it might attract their attention.

And, yes: this is a public message board. Things could be picked up by anybody out there.

I also think the DM, its works and its journalists are vile, btw.

StreamsFullOfStars · 26/06/2019 07:47

Mumsnet have previously confirmed that they receive 'a fee' for the posts that appear in the Daily Mail. Not surprisingly they don't shout it from the rooftops. It came up when there was the data breach and I asked about it in a thread where Mumsnet were answering questions on the data breach

RandomNameChange415 · 26/06/2019 07:48

Mumsnet say they don’t sell the threads and I believe them: partly because I’m trusting but mostly because there’s no reason for the DM to pay good money for content when it’s completely legal for them to scour the site and “report” any juicy items for free.

It’s just like when news sites bulk out a non-story with Twitter comments. Neither Twitter nor the commenter will have sold it to the news site, although larger news organisations may approach the commenter for more details if they think it would add value.

SoupDragon · 26/06/2019 07:49

Mumsnet have previously confirmed that they receive 'a fee' for the posts that appear in the Daily Mail.

I thought they'd done the opposite.

Swipe left for the next trending thread