I am getting married this summer. It's a small registry office do, followed by a small lunch in a local pub. However, if we'd had our way we would have eloped with 'off th street' witnesses. We didn't as a couple of close family membrs would have been upset, despite the majority saying they would have been happy for us to do what we want.
The ceremony is just immediate family members only, making 10 people altogether. We decided to invite a few extended family to the reception afterwards, so they wouldn't feel left out. As a side note, we are paying for it all ourselves.
However, DP's father is kicking off, because his siblings (DP's aunt /unlces) have only been invited to the reception. He said they should be invited to the ceremony and if they're not invited, he doesn't want to come.
I should add that DP hasn't seen these aunts/uncles for about five years, and I met them once, about seven years ago. They are the most distant people (to us) coming to the reception, infact people much closer to us haven't been invited. This was a compromise in the first place to please DP's father, but it's not enough.
Are we being unreasonable to not have invited them? This is stress I really don't need :(