A lot of buyers seem to act like insurance company loss-adjusters (or a certain company that buys any car, so I hear) in actively looking for anything they can to justify paying you less, even if there's nothing actually wrong.
who in their right mind would want to pay top price for a house? Of course you try to bring the price down as much as the market allows. A few years ago, you were lucky if your full asking price offer was accepted, properties were flying off the shelves. (in my area I mean). The market has massively slowed down, buyers can afford to negotiate.
If you do not like their lower offer, just ... say no?
It's a business negotiation, sounds more than reasonable to try to move the price.
I have no problem at all with people making an offer of what they're willing to pay at the outset and, of course, the asking price is always going to be very overly-optimistic, so it's completely normal to negotiate on price then.
I probably didn't make my point very clearly, but the part I hate is where people have made offers that have been verbally agreed in principle, in good faith on the part of the seller, but instead of their supposed offer being their actual offer, the buyers actually see it as their opening gambit.
The seller believes that they have a serious buyer at an agreed price and the buying/selling process begins in earnest, but, as planned all along, when the process is well underway, the buyer then starts fault-finding and making spurious claims in an attempt to chip away at the price they pay.
Obviously, any genuine areas of concern that subsequently arise are fully valid, and may well lead to a price re-negotiation, but things that were blatantly obvious from the start or invented concerns, such as structural or integral parts of the property not having been constructed in accordance with standard regulations that didn't exist until decades after the house was actually built, and then suddenly demanding a huge price-drop on that basis or threatening to pull out, are outrageous.
It wasn't to do with actually selling the house, but we had the lender's valuer come as part of our application to re-mortgage for a better rate. Now this was shortly before the financial crisis hit, so I wonder if inside information had caused lenders to instruct their employees to pare things right down and refuse new borrowing for spurious reasons without raising any alarm.
However, he expressed grave concern at a single-skin upstairs wall that apparently made our house valueless/unmortgageable and he almost fled downstairs in fear for his life because of this impending death-trap that could fall and crush the breath out of him at any moment.
The house was built in around 1820. The wall shows no signs of ever having moved since then (just a few slight cracks in the plaster). It was safe for 150 years before the valuer was even born and I fully expect it to still be safely standing 150 years after we've gone.