*I mean did anyone even read the links
eg
"Data obtained through a parliamentary question by the MP shows an increase of 1,000 children going missing from care homes since 2015, after being moved to new areas often miles from their homes, known as an “out of area placement”.
Numbers have more than doubled from 990 in 2015, to 1,990 in 2018. This compares with a 31% increase for children who go missing from homes within their own borough.
Coffey said: “It shames us all that thousands of vulnerable children continue to be farmed out to live miles and miles away from home despite a government promise to clampdown on numbers.
“Isolated and alone without family, friends or local social workers to help protect them, they become sitting ducks for those who wish to prey on them. They are targeted by paedophiles and drugs gangs and can become trapped in a brutal world.”"
The claims that humans are well provided for is untrue. Some are. Others are not. Depending on their perceived value*
I read your links.
One claims increase in missing children in care. I agree. This does not mean they are not being actively searched for and returned home. The article is not about those going permanently missing.
The above is also true that out of area children in care go missing more frequently. The point it misses though is these children are often moved out of area due to unresolveable problems in their existing area- they could be already children that go missing frequently, or those that are at risk from cse or county lines. They are often moved to sever ties with their original network.
Children of colour I can’t comment on but I cannot say I have noticed any bias in our local force (i work closely with their sg dept)
What I will say is social media campaigns are only carried out if a missing person is classed at serious risk of harm, to themselves or others. Many children go missing often but sofa surf with friends or are in contact with social care, parents or police, so they aren’t high risk. So you won’t see them on twitter etc. It’s not that one person is more important, it’s the individual risk.