We have a huge range of books for DS(8) from baby books he wants to keep to adult encyclopedias (he prefers non-fiction) and everything in between. We read everyday and his current bed time book is Lord of The Rings. He's a happy and confident reader with free access to books.
However, DH and I have very few books. DH dislikes reading (although he reads with DS) and my epilepsy meds affect my concentration and make it difficult for me to read. I used to be a big reader though. We also have a small house and would rather dedicate what space we have for books to DS. Neither of us are sentimental about books and pass them on when we're done with them. DH does have a few of his course books from uni.
As DS has free access to books at home and with trips to the library I don't feel he is missing out.
But people seem to look down their noses at people who haven't got wall to ceiling bookcases in every room. I sometimes read things on here which suggest that people with large book collections (even if they haven't read most of them) think they are superior to those who don't keep books. Or that someone with more books in their house is more intelligent just by them being there, like osmosis or something.
AIBU to disagree with this? Having access to books and reading is obviously hugely important but the more books you have doesn't make you a better person.