www.thetimes.co.uk/article/susanna-reid-reflects-on-sobriety-and-a-social-season-without-alcohol-2pz0lv2l5
If it's behind the paywall in essence Susanna Reid has been not drinking/sober/teetotal for 7 months. Except she says 'I’ve been unfaithful to sobriety precisely eight times. And I remember every single one (which makes a change from the way I used to drink).'
So the story really is 'Susanna Reid drinks once a month now'. Which is absolutely fine but isn't, to my mind, teetotal. My boss hadn't drunk in 2 years. Not a drop. He is 'teetotal' in my book.
I'm not questioning her reasoning (health rather than concerns over alcoholism) just the description of her behaviour. She's cut down which should be applauded because with alcohol less is always better for your health.
But since when did drinking 8 times in 7 months make you teetotal? Wikipedia describes it as: 'Teetotalismis the practice or promotion of complete personalabstinencefromalcoholic beverages.' Sobriety I'm fine with but it's not synonymous with teetotal. 'Stopped drinking' also isn't accurate. She says 'I should really put “stopped drinking” in inverted commas, because since August 26, which is the day I decided to put an end to my relationship with alcohol, I haven’t been entirely dry.'
Her decision to reduce her alcohol intake is admirable but the reporting of it is misleading or AIBU?