Canshopwillshop
I, to use your phrase, "don't get" your attitude! How can you have the selfish and arrogant and uncaring nerve to write, in a public forum about the cost of School Journeys/Trips:
I don’t get the attitude that if some can’t afford it then no one should get the opportunity.
As if that was not enough, you want to crush the educational opportunities of the poorer pupils for once and for all and you say:
Secondly, why do those who can afford it have to miss out for fear of upsetting those who can’t!
I am so shocked that you say this! Why do you think that Schools organise Trips? Schools are not Travel Agents! The trips are not holidays. Read what Eyja says: about the £1000 five day trip for her dd.-:
"Her class were learning about the African-American civil rights movement for their History A-level, and the school put on a trip to Georgia and Alabama. They visited Martin Luther King’s birthplace and memorial in Atlanta, the church in Birmingham, Alabama which was bombed killing 4 little black girls, the Edmund Pettus bridge in Selma where the Bloody Sunday protestors were violently assaulted by the police etc.
It was worth every penny - she came back utterly enthused and smashed the A-level course. "
I think it must have been a successful trip! An educational trip. Hence organised by the school! But very expensive! I wonder how the less wealthy children managed? Did they have to miss out on the trip and miss-out on "smashing" their A-level?
Remember - schools are there to provide education. A state school has a duty to provide equal opportunities to all its pupils. The trip is not a holiday it is for education. See what Eyja says:
"it’s not a place you’d ever go on holiday by yourself - surely that’s what schools are for. Broadening horizons, introducing you to new places and new ways of looking at things. "
Well said Eyja! However, did your daughter's school take everyone who wanted to go? Or just those that could afford it?
Schools are there to give equal educational opportunities to every single pupil and when offering a school trip, not one single child can be disbarred from that educational opportunity, not for any reason. If we suddenly decided we were not taking the children who paid in instalments, or we would not take the children with straight hair, there would be an uproar! It is just the same for children of less well-off parents. Children of parents who do not have as much income as the other parents are equal members of the school in every way. They must be given access to every opportunity that their classmates are offered. Including school trips.
I am horrified that there are parents who think it is ok to say that it doesn't matter if some children's parents don't have a high enough income to allow their child to go on the school trip. Listen to yourselves! Those children deserve the school trip even more than the children of parents who can find the money, because they have less support from home in Eyja's terms of "Broadening horizons, introducing you to new places and new ways of looking at things" simply because their parents can't afford do those kinds of things. Homes with more money can afford to take the children out and see more. The poorer children rely on their schooling to widen their horizons. They need more help from the school and must go on the trips!