Agnurse please answer honestly WHY you would make a woman have to jump through hoops to have removed a medical device that is causing her problems?
Cos frankly I ain't buying what you're trying to sell. This DOES NOT happen with other meds with the possible exception of mh meds (which is a WHOLE other thread!!)
"because they tend to operate a very different appointment system to GPs" they also operate on a very different funding system.
"I’m training to be a GP" please DO read the thread I linked earlier in hopes of NOT being the kind of GP that dismisses women and girls routinely on a number of health issues, not just gynae/family planning matters. Some really shocking stories including a few where the gps dismissiveness had fatal consequences.
I'm gonna say it and it's been a long time coming, it's NOT just patients that are wasting primary care appointments. If such ridiculousness stopped there'd be more appointments available.
"Must be a finance thing" it is, the push to have women on LARC is being financially "incentivised"
"As a nursing instructor" I hope you're teaching your students genuine autonomy of patients and not to be dismissive, however based on your posts here I'm not holding my breath.
If it were REALLY about educating women on pre-conception health why is it ONLY applied to women on LARC? Do you make women who are stopping using the pill, depo or condoms or other short term/self limiting contraception have the same "chat"? Do you refuse to let them stop using those methods until they have?
"If I, as a nurse, gave a patient a medication and didn't ensure that they knew about the side effects because I just assumed they did, and they suffered serious harm, I could be held liable for not educating them. It's a professional responsibility." And yet this is what's happening constantly especially with LARC women are being told they're imagining the side effects, "they'll settle down give it a chance" or "well it's not that bad" - suck it up! That they're not allowed to have them removed within X amount of time - honestly there's a wealth of stories like this on mn and in the press, stories of women having horrific side effects from LARC but being unable to get the damn things removed!
"Not to mention that if they're experiencing problems such as potentially very serious side effects, we need to actually report those" I've read several examples of where this isn't happening again especially with LARC.
If a woman wants LARC removed that's all an hcp needs to know, women shouldn't have to justify and defend such a request EVER!