I’m also toying with buying a much older car around £1000 and running it into the ground. My question really is which is the sensible option. I know people who have had bangers and driven them for years with no issues and yet our other 5 year old car has already cost us 1k in repairs!
I'm in the £1,000 car camp. When you get a costly repair, you just buy another one! We've had 2 old Audis, a 1996 that was bought in 2009 and we ran for 6 years, and which only ever needed a couple of bulbs and a new battery, and the current one, a 2001, that we've had for 4 years and spent next to fuck all on.
Old cars don't have all the complicated electronics that costs a fortune to fix and if you stick to petrol, you don't have all the expensive gizmos like dual mass flywheels and diesel particulate filters.
The other car is a £400 banger bought when the first Audi's driveshaft went. It still starts, but we've let the MOT run out as we have no need of it atm.
When you spend a few grand on a car, you can't afford to scrap it because it needs a grand spending on it, and then you can easily end up throwing good money after bad.
Even if I was a gazillionaire, I'd think twice about buying new because of the depreciation. Although I daresay some cars are so rare and unique they're virtually depreciation-proof.
I could be tempted to pay big money on a classic if I was loaded. I love old Jags and old Mercs. I bitterly regret selling a 1964 Mercedes 220SE that I owned with my then boyfriend in 1976/77.
Imagine driving round in this
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mercedes_Benz_220SE_(1965).jpg
but mine was nicer, because it was dark green.