Hello all,
I'm on the events committee at work. We're lucky enough to have fairly free rein from management about the types or event we put on within the allocated yearly budget, although there is a general feeling that we should aim for them to have as wide an appeal as possible (so nothing too niche as to rule certain groups out, not just evening drinks events, etc.).
One of our group is leaving the company in a few months and has asked whether some of our remaining budget for the year can be put towards the leaving drinks she's organised as more than half of the company have accepted the event invitation.
I'm waiting to her from the rest of the group but AIBU to feel an instinctive "no"? On one hand our budget is looking healthy and if a lot of the company go in a way it seems to have met our aim of pleasing as many people as possible. However I'm just not sure in principle that we can allocate company funds to one specific person - even if attendance looks healthy there will be people who might not feel comfortable going because they don't know/like the person and so are ruled out at the outset. It could also set a tricky precedent - if we now get lots of requests for support for individual events how do we decide what gets funds?
Am I just being a stick in the mud and will end up forever known as the party pooper that ruined that night?
She's already told quite a few people in the company that there should be some money behind the bar but I can't help but feel she's being a bit of a CF to expect the company to bankroll it... thanks all for your thoughts!