I was just rejected from a job post-interview on the grounds that I didn't have the right experience for it. My CV was very clear about the experience I had. I questioned the recruiter as to why I was invited to interview if I didn't have the right experience for the position and they told me that my CV showed that I "had relevant experience they could build on" so that's why I was invited to interview, but that I "didn't express this at interview". I probably spent about 50 per cent of the interview talking about the specific details of my current job and discussing with the interviewer ways in which it was similar and had transferable skills, to which the interviewer even said the phrase "it's a very similar process" and "that's easy to train you on though" about one part of the job role that I didn't have prior experience in. I am very confused, but mainly just annoyed that I feel they wasted loads of my time (it was quite a long process for a low paid job!). AIBU that if I didn't have the right experience, they shouldn't have wasted my time interviewing me?