I’m so glad you started this thread, OP. I recently had an interview for a uni job, basic grade support role which I could have done standing on my head as I have 20 years experience of it, a much easier role than I am currently doing (I wanted to go part time and not able to in my current role). For that reason I wasn’t too nervous going into the interview. But to my horror, i fluffed it completely and froze up on some questions. It was just so new to me, the whole process.
I last had an interview about 11 years ago, for little part time support role in a secondary school. There was a panel but it was informal, there was an actual dialogue, the questions were more open which put me at my ease. Eg tell me more about your role at X, which parts did you enjoy? Etc. When they wanted to know more about something I said they asked me to say more which was encouraging. They seemed interested so I was relaxed while talking. 100 people applied for that job and I was the one to get it. I have been there ever since but have gradually moved up to a more senior full time post (department only had 2 people in it anyway! (all without further interview, as I was doing the job anyway when my manager was doing other things)
So, for this uni basic grade easy peasy job, I went in totally unprepared for the style of interview you all mention. It was a panel, they were nice enough. But it was literally, ask me a question, scribble down loads of notes and not ask me ANYTHING else at all to encourage me to expand on a point. I took it as a sign that either I had said enough for that question, or that I was doing so badly they just didn’t want to hear more. I mean, there were nods from them but when I’d say a few sentences and wait for a response from them so that we could continue what I had thought would be a dialogue, none was forthcoming. They would pause and then ask me the next question.
My answers got worse and worse, I was panicking and not listening properly to questions by the end of the interview as my brain was still obsessed with the mess I made I’d of the previous question!!
Needless to say I didn’t get it, Feedback I got was that some of my answers were short!!!
I too was mortified. I should have walked that job. I had 2 years experience, fantastic references, I wasn’t a job flitter, it was clear I was good as I got promoted internally or given extra responsibility in some previous roles..
It was simply not the style of interview that I have ever experienced before. DH is civil service and I remember in the late 90s him doing a competency-based interview. I thought it was pathetic at the time. He was virtually learning lines in a play to prepare. Got advice from a colleague on what he needed to say to score the points they were looking for. So not about his ability to do the job at all, they couldn’t get to know him as a person as the interview wasn’t set up like that. It was purely how well he performed. He did get the job as he knew what he needed to do.
I didn’t. But I do now at least so have a better chance in future interviews. However Like many others, I am not a performer, boaster, blagger, I’m not a sell myself kind of person, or an actor remembering lines. I am not up on bullshit bingo words and buzz phrases that you do desperately seem to need to hear. I CAN talk at length about my working life and experiences if we have a dialogue. An actual conversation, to know which bits most interest you. You WOULD find out how I would fit into your team if you let me relax and be myself. Even a “tell us about yourself” at the start of the interview would do that (you always had those years ago in interviews). I am bloody good at my job, but feel annoyed that I will not get the chance to prove it if all interview styles are like this.
Preparation will be key, as everyone has said. I turned down an offer from my school to have the whole day off for the interview as I knew it would be a ball ache trying to get cover while I was away. In hindsight I should have taken the whole day and prepared myself better for my “performance”!