Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

£1,000 fines per parent per child to be trialled in Lancashire

180 replies

mummymeister · 21/01/2019 17:31

Aibu to think that this will disproportionately hit poorer families, those not in private schools (where fines don't apply) and those people with jobs where you cant just take time off in school holidays.

Not sure how many people have seen this news item but it was pretty inevitable that the fines would go up massively to deter days off in term. The trial is for £1,000 fines per parent per child - so £4,000 for a family of 4 making it less attractive to take the odd day at the start/beginning of a holiday.

www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/parents-to-be-fined-%c2%a31000-for-taking-children-on-holiday-during-term-time/ar-BBSuKFY?ocid=ientp

OP posts:
BarbarianMum · 21/01/2019 17:38

Ime its not the poorest families that take their kids out for holidays.

Quartz2208 · 21/01/2019 17:40

the odd day would still be ok - Lancashire (currently) follow this:

Before a penalty notice is considered, a pupil must have had a minimum of:

5 school days/10 sessions unauthorised absence in a term or
7 school days/14 sessions unauthorised absence over 2 consecutive terms

MarieKondo · 21/01/2019 17:40

Agreed, I think it’s horrendous. It’s not just holidays though. If you as a parent felt your child was exhausted / run down and decided to keep them at home for the day then you would be breaking the law - which is ridiculous.

lastqueenofscotland · 21/01/2019 17:41

Agree with Barbarian
It’s usually middle class parents claiming their jolly is once in a lifetime or more educational than spending time with a trained education professional

mummymeister · 21/01/2019 17:41

It is in our area Barbarian. many of the working families are given holidays they don't get a choice. £4,000 for a family of 4 would have to be a pretty high end holiday to be worth that.

OP posts:
SwimmingJustKeepSwimming · 21/01/2019 17:41

Our school us currently finining 60£ per parent per child even if just one dat umautjorised.

So 240...!!!! Im really shocked. It made sort of sense when under a week, once, was okay.

mummymeister · 21/01/2019 17:43

If the increased level of the fine is established then the implementation of it will be a lottery. some areas do fine for the first absence. some almost never fine. Its the establishment of the principle of fines this high that is the issue.

OP posts:
Racecardriver · 21/01/2019 17:44

How many poor families are actually taking holidays though? YABU. It’s hard enough for kids to get a decent education these days without parents taking them out for holidays.

SwimmingJustKeepSwimming · 21/01/2019 17:44

That is a crazy high fine!

BarbarianMum · 21/01/2019 17:44

So who are the employers around you that dont allow holidays out of term time?

mummymeister · 21/01/2019 17:45

Its not just holidays. its unauthorised absences. so that could be for a funeral. and don't say people haven't been fined for this because they have. there have been past threads on MN about it.

OP posts:
Goldmandra · 21/01/2019 17:46

That worries me for the families who have children with SEND whose needs aren't being met in school, resulting in anxiety based school refusal. There are hundreds (if not thousands) of families in this position and the default position of the school is often to threaten fines.

I'm confident that the vast majority would win hands-down if their case went to court but the threats cause huge stress and anxiety for parents who are already struggling, missing time in work working really hard to try to help their distressed child.

whatsthestory123 · 21/01/2019 17:47

saw a bit about this on MR C5 today

i dont know anybody that could afford to pay that and i doubt many people could it would have to be some holiday to be prepared to pay that

i know quite a few people that have taken the kids out and paid the present fine as it is douable especially if you pay for a package holiday abroad

i guess by my comment then it would work in stopping term time holidays,though yes many familys cant pay a fine of 1k so no holiday or a much cheaper one in holidays

i was lucky last year as i did manage to go in the school holidays,many cant

i would like to see some sought of compromise but what that would be im not to sureConfused

basicaally i dont agree with a 1k fine

mummymeister · 21/01/2019 17:47

Barbarian - any tourism area in the UK wouldn't allow employees in the tourism industry to take time off in school holidays. that's cleaners, people working in shops and restaurants, people running attractions, car park attendants and so on.

Its also people who work in organisations where you get allocated your holidays with no choice. this affects a lot of people too.

personally, I am self employed in a very niche industry (so wont name as its outing) where I can only take time in school term time as can all of my staff.

OP posts:
whatsthestory123 · 21/01/2019 17:48

FGS Jeremy Vine

User758172 · 21/01/2019 17:48

The odd day off or even - god forbid - a holiday during term time does no damage to a child’s education.

Tiredeyes21 · 21/01/2019 17:48

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-46950372

It’s scaremongering and not true

Nicknacky · 21/01/2019 17:48

barbarian I get set annual leave and if it’s not school holidays then tough luck.

I’m in Scotland and our head authorises my kids annual holiday.

user1471590586 · 21/01/2019 17:50

Lancashire have released a statement saying this is untrue. www.lancashire.gov.uk/news/details/?Id=PR19/0017

Sirzy · 21/01/2019 17:50

Lancashire have confirmed this is rubbish

marymarkle · 21/01/2019 17:50

Tough on those who do not get annual leave during school holidays. This used to be me. Only time I was allowed off over any school holidays was at Xmas.

ExFury · 21/01/2019 17:51

If your employer will confirm you can only have holidays at that time then fines shouldn’t apply.

That’s still a ridiculous hike though

PattiStanger · 21/01/2019 17:51

That article says maybe and up to and specifically excludes funerals, nothing actually definite as far as I can see.

I'm going to watch and reserve judgement until the policy has been fully trialled.

mummymeister · 21/01/2019 17:52

tiredeyes21 - not scaremongering they are "gathering ideas" its what government does. it throws something out there and then looks for the reaction. why would a school say this to parents if not true or something that was discussed.

perhaps Lancashire is being economical with the truth.

OP posts:
PattiStanger · 21/01/2019 17:53

Ok so it was debunked while I was typing, was the original article fake news?