Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Landlord Fergus Wilson to evict 90 families and possibly more.

39 replies

HelenaDove · 14/01/2019 19:51

www.theguardian.com/money/2019/jan/14/familes-facing-homelessness-after-tycoon-issues-eviction-notices

"Dozens of families are facing the risk of homelessness after receiving eviction notices from one of Britain’s biggest and most controversial buy-to-let tycoons.

Fergus Wilson is giving 90 households in Ashford, Kent two months to get out after he decided to sell his 700 property portfolio in the county estimated to be worth more than £200m. He is expected to issue hundreds more evictions in the coming months before retiring to “take life easy”.

Wilson started sending out the “no fault” eviction notices on Monday and has already been told by nine families with children under 10 that they have no chance of getting another property and could be left homeless. Wilson owns the whole of one street in Ashford and will send out the section 21 eviction notices to all 15 properties in the coming months. He conceded none of them had been difficult tenants.

I feel remorse but, at the same time, I am going to have to do it,” he said. “If I give them six months, so what? Unless somebody is going to rapidly build a lot more houses, where do the people live in the meantime?”

He admitted that evictions, if they require court action, “can totally ruin their lives”, but said: “I don’t make the problem.” He added: “They are not doing very well at finding somewhere to go. If their household income is under £30,000, you can bet your boots they won’t get a property.”

Wilson blamed the risk of homelessness on the failure of national policy to build more homes and immigration from eastern Europe for the housing shortage.

Wilson and his wife Judith began acquiring houses in 1991 and built up a lettings portfolio of 700 homes across Kent. In 2017, he was ordered by a court to ditch a policy of refusing to let his houses to people who cooked curry, because it left a smell in the carpets that he could not get out. A judge ruled the policy amounted to unlawful discrimination. Wilson continues to insist the policy was not racist and said he rented his homes to Muslim families.

Last month, Judith Wilson was fined for failing to comply with an enforcement notice ordering her to supply hot water to a disabled tenant.

The prospects for families who cannot find affordable alternatives are unclear. About 1,500 households are on Ashford borough council’s waiting list for social housing, but Cllr Gerald White, the cabinet member for housing, said: “If anybody is becoming homeless, we will deal with that.”

The government is facing calls from renters and housing campaigners, backed by Labour, to scrap section 21 evictions. Under current laws, tenants can be evicted for any reason after the first six months of an assured shorthold tenancy. Evictions from private rentals are now the cause of 27% of homelessness. Last summer, the government floated the idea of introducing minimum three-year tenancies but has not done it.

The private rented sector has doubled in size over the past decade and provides a home to one in every five households in the country. One in four families with children are now privately renting, up from one in 10 a decade ago."

OP posts:
Seline · 14/01/2019 20:49

Speaking about selling off the Ashford homes, Mr Wilson said he is in talks with businessmen from India and Nigeria.

So "coloured" people are good enough to do business with when he wants something then, but not to provide homes for? Utter wanker.

HelenaDove · 14/01/2019 20:51

He objects to providing homes for plumbers/gas engineers as well There are a few comments from some of them underneath the Kent articles who say they would refuse to work on his properties.

OP posts:
HaudYerWheeshtYaWeeBellend · 14/01/2019 20:54

His character has nothing to do with selling the properties tho, his reputation speaks for itself, I’m not sure what his character is being brought into him selling his portfolio so he can retire.

Inliverpool1 · 14/01/2019 20:59

Didn’t they used to be teachers ? Thank goodness they aren’t around children any more.

SouthWestmom · 14/01/2019 21:03

Haud I think because it seems to be a spiteful response to a fine after a court case in November. That's not my view just the way it seems to have been commented on locally.

Seniorcitizen1 · 14/01/2019 21:03

The govt should buy them and let the tenants remain paying a reasonable rent

Justanotherlurker · 14/01/2019 21:10

Strange how you would assume that i was in support of him though given my posting history and all.

That is the reason I have questioned your post though, you initially just posted an article.

Fuckwit Wilson has been threatening sell of since the tories got into power, to highlight the shitshow we are in, the Guardian did a few puff Wilson center pieces about how BTL is a money earner in the run up to 2008.

If it tories bring in regulations that hit people like Wilson I will not cry a tear, just, there will be an outcry of many labour supporters thinking they are providing a service, but fuck them too.

Justanotherlurker · 14/01/2019 21:12

The govt should buy them and let the tenants remain paying a reasonable rent

No they shouldn't as its giving him a way out and an opening of the floodgates.

StartingGrid · 14/01/2019 21:15

Section 24 and lenders turning away from large portfolio landlords means this pair are likely to be in a financial hole pretty soon if not already, thats likely the reason for selling

HelenaDove · 14/01/2019 23:13

i certainly wont cry a tear for him either but he has been holding this threat over tenants for 11 years?

One landlord should not have that much power.

OP posts:
HaudYerWheeshtYaWeeBellend · 15/01/2019 07:20

The threat has always been there whether is been spoken out loud or not.

It’s the risknyou take from a private landlord when you don’t have an assured tenancy.

It’s not new news.

TheBigBangRocks · 15/01/2019 07:34

He’s 70, he’s selling his property portfolio by serving section 21 - perfectly legal, and not unethical in anyway, as with any rented properties you can be served your notice at any point, it’s the risk you take with renting

This ^

Every LL can issue notice, it's a known risk of renting. Tenants know they will likely have to move oftem so should ensure they have the means to do that. Giving notice doesn't equal homelessness otherwise nobody would ever rent. They just find another rental like everyone else does.

OP posts:
VeryLittleOwl · 30/01/2019 07:06

That Guardian article is slightly incorrect:

In Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and Scotland renters cannot be evicted without a reason.

Under the new Scottish PRT, one of the mandatory grounds for eviction (i.e. a court cannot refuse it) is that the landlord intends to sell the property, so it wouldn't have made the slightest bit of difference in this case.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread