KC225
OMG. The Ageists are out in full tonight. *It's not ageist to take account of the safety of children due to known physical or mental deficits that are a natural and inevitable part of ageing - that's not ageist! First and foremost safety is what must be provided - end of"
Having 11 twins, I would imagine the 'not being able to cope' is more about attitude and bickering with three boys age 11-13. Who has 11 twins, that's 22 children?
Take a loom around, their are young mothers a plenty who are overweight and they seem to manage. Yes, but being 21 and overweight and being 75 and overweight (with additional physical issues such as poor balance, poor physical aerobic condition) not only could the children be at risk if they ran towards a road but the GPs could injure themselves trying to run after them
And you know what, it doesn't take an origami master to use a disposable nappy. Remember that generation had to terry cloth and pins.Except that these fabulously caring people have already indicated they've got NO interest in changing a nappy, terry cloth or otherwise! How do you think that would work out? Coming back to a child with a sopping nappy?!
The child in question can still get time with the GPs which I totally agree is valuable beyond words, but not if it's at the risk of the child's health or safety, or the GPs health or safety.