To think that Meghan has probably only got 6 weeks to go...

[caroline161]

Any midwives/ or anyone want to have a guess? If she delivers jan/ Feb may suggest she was already pregnant when they married not that it matters but a bit of a turn up for the Royals....

Or possibly, Punto, not all women show on the exact same timetable that you did? I was bloody huge at 5 months with my first.

Make of that what you will. I make that she's fobbing off yet another nosey git politely. It's bloody annoying answering people's questions repeatedly when you're pregnant so you go on auto pilot.

I agree, I reckon that baby will come 2nd week in Feb.

And there's nothing nasty about guessing! fgs. Some people do appoint themselves moral guardians.

53. I really couldn't give two shiny shites if she gave birth tomorrow to twin elephants. I'm speculating. Fucking hell. It's hardly a group of obstetricians sitting around working out her due date.

I think if it's a girl she'll deffo work "Diana" into the name. She's not daft.

I’m really hoping for an ‘I agree with Anyfucker’button on here soon, for my convenience! Spot on, the constant prattling on about “Meg” is beyond tedious. Leave the woman alone ffs.

Pmsl at a pp calling her 'Meg'
I am totally fascinated as to why someone would think this was a normal thing to do

The poor woman, the amount of stick she gets from the press and on the internet, and it only seems to have got worse since she was pregnant. It's embarrassing hounding a pregnant woman. And people are all 'oh she'll find it hard to settle in the UK' But who would honestly want to put up with that amount of shit for no reason.

yeah okay, Punto1, sorry for expressing any doubts at all about your speculation method there

Jeez. Different women have different configurations, different builds, different musculature. My first pregnancy, I looked like a brick shithouse by about 30 weeks and random strangers were stopping me in the street to congratulate me on my imminent twins. I was a 12-14 when I became pregnant and clearly Meghan is tiny in comparison, but different women carry babies different.

but yeah, the amateur gynaes on this thread obviously have insider info.

I really don’t think she looks unusually big for 5/6 months pregnant. I was a similar size at that point and have seen plenty of other women with sizeable bumps at 20-25 weeks pregnant.

Kate wasn’t showing at all at that stage, which is also not unusual. All women are different! I’m just confused as to why so many comments online are saying Meghan must be due any second when she really doesn’t look ridiculously big

My DD is due in April, we played the same game round the dining room table yesterday. With zero fucking malice.

Yes, but your family probably aren’t trying to suggest that your baby was concerned out of wedlock, and that therefore you’re not good enough for the Royal Family.

I think she’s having twins.

Much less tall than Kate.
Couldn't care less when it arrives.

Oh cmon folks who are bashing OP, it's a discussion point, a common interest type thing. Personally I'm fed up of 'Kate wears a hat that looks minutely like one Diana did 30 years ago'

I hope she has puppies and names them Biff, Socks and Trever.

A few people are guessing when the baby will arrive

Nice try but the suggestion that the child will be born earlier is insinuating some kind of Royal scandal.

Can you imagine Social Media was a thing when Diana was alive, it would have consumed her. Back then we could be pious and blame the Paps forgetting that Paps are all about meeting demand.

Meh, I’ve got about six weeks to go, and her bump does look a similar size to mine. However, I looked completely different at 34 weeks the first time round, and everyone carries differently so that doesn’t really reveal anything. I expect she’ll give birth in March, ie spring, just as announced.